Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
A consensus-established set of important indicators of pediatric emergency department performance
Geoffrey R Hung1, Dominic Chalut
1Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ghung@cw.bc.ca
Insights
Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) find clinical outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and waiting times most useful for performance assessment. However, current measurement practices may not align with these preferred indicators for quality assurance in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM).
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Healthcare Quality Assurance
- Performance Measurement
Background:
- Quality assurance is a critical, yet underexplored, area in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM).
- Limited research exists on identifying optimal performance indicators for pediatric emergency departments (PEDs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify performance indicators most valued by PED medical directors for assessing PED performance.
- To determine which performance indicators are currently being measured in PEDs.
Main Methods:
- A survey was administered to current and former directors of Canadian accredited PEM programs.
- Indicators were generated, refined for clarity and quantifiability, and then prioritized based on perceived usefulness by directors.
- A novel ranking formula was employed to prioritize indicators based on respondent ratings.
Main Results:
- Indicators related to patient morbidity, mortality, adverse outcomes, return visits, length of stay (LOS), and waiting times were rated as most useful.
- Less useful indicators included death counts, daily census, incident reports, and individual physician admission rates.
- Currently measured indicators most frequently included patients leaving without being seen, LOS, and triage-based waiting times.
Conclusions:
- The most useful performance indicators focus on clinical outcomes, LOS, and waiting times.
- A potential gap exists between the performance indicators deemed most useful by PED directors and those currently implemented in practice.
Background:
Quality assurance is a new and important area of research in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). There are few studies that describe which performance indicators best represent the PEM practice. The primary study objective is to construct a set of performance indicators that have been selected by current and former pediatric emergency department (PED) medical directors as most useful in assessing PED performance. The secondary objective is to assess which indicators are currently measured to assess performance in PEDs.
Methods:
Current and former directors of accredited Canadian PEM programs were considered as eligible participants. A list of indicators was generated by a survey (item pool generation); this list was refined by clarifying unclear terms or eliminating redundant and unquantifiable performance indicators (item scaling); PED directors were asked to rate each item of this refined list to indicate which indicators were more useful in assessing PED performance (item prioritization). A novel ranking formula was used to prioritize those items considered most useful by a larger proportion of respondents, using the provided rating scores.
Results:
Fourteen current and former medical directors were considered eligible participants. Indicators related to patient morbidity and mortality, adverse outcomes, return visits, patient length of stay (LOS), and waiting times were considered to be more useful. Less useful indicators included the number of deaths, daily census, number of incident reports, and individual physicians' admission rates. The most commonly measured PED performance indicators included the rate of patients who left without being seen, patient LOS, and the waiting time until being seen by a physician by triage category.
Conclusions:
The top quartile of performance indicators considered most useful by participants included indicators that reflected clinical outcomes, LOS, and waiting times. A dichotomy may exist between those performance indicators that PED directors considered more useful and those indicators that are currently measured.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

