Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Multiplexed Isothermal Amplification Based Diagnostic Platform to Detect Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue 1
Published on: March 13, 2018
Investigating transmission in a two-wave epidemic of Chikungunya fever, Réunion Island
P-Y Boëlle1, G Thomas, E Vergu
1Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Parisó, UMR S 707, Paris, France. boelle@U707.jussieu.fr
Abstract:
An epidemic of Chikungunya fever, a mosquito-borne viral disease, spectacularly swept through Réunion Island (population 780,000) in 2005-2006. There were 3,000 cases in a first wave (March-June 2005) and more than 250,000 cases in a second (December 2005-April 2006). Adapting newly developed epidemiological tools to vector-borne diseases, we show that despite this massive difference in magnitude, the transmission potential as measured by the number of secondary cases per index case (or reproduction number), remained similar during the two consecutive waves. The best estimate for the initial reproduction number R(0) was 3.7, with a possible range from 2 to 11 depending on incubation duration and lifespan of the mosquito. We conclude that an increase in virulence between the two seasons was not necessary to explain the change in magnitude of the epidemics, and that the attack rate may be well over 50% in Chikungunya fever epidemics in the absence of intervention.
Insights
Chikungunya fever epidemics can vary greatly in size, but the virus's transmission potential remained consistent. This suggests increased virulence wasn't the cause, and high attack rates are possible without intervention.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Vector-borne diseases
- Virology
Background:
- Chikungunya fever is a mosquito-borne viral illness.
- Réunion Island experienced a large epidemic in 2005-2006 with two distinct waves.
- The second wave saw a significantly higher number of cases than the first.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the transmission dynamics of Chikungunya fever during the 2005-2006 epidemic.
- To compare the transmission potential (reproduction number) between the two epidemic waves.
- To investigate factors contributing to the difference in epidemic magnitude.
Main Methods:
- Utilized newly developed epidemiological tools adapted for vector-borne diseases.
- Calculated the reproduction number (R0) for each wave of the epidemic.
- Estimated R0 based on incubation duration and mosquito lifespan.
Main Results:
- The reproduction number (R0) remained similar between the two epidemic waves.
- The best estimate for R0 was 3.7, with a possible range of 2 to 11.
- The difference in epidemic magnitude was not explained by increased virulence.
Conclusions:
- Increased virulence is not necessary to explain the differing magnitudes of Chikungunya fever epidemics.
- The attack rate for Chikungunya fever can exceed 50% in the absence of public health interventions.
- Epidemiological tools can effectively assess transmission potential in vector-borne disease outbreaks.
Related Concept Videos
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Arboviral Encephalitis
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Principles of Disease Surveillance
