Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in tetralogy of Fallot
Paul Khairy1, Louise Harris, Michael J Landzberg
1Adult Congenital Heart Center, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Bélanger St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1T 1C8. paul.khairy@umontreal.ca
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in Tetralogy of Fallot patients provide effective shock therapy but carry risks. High rates of appropriate shocks and lead complications necessitate careful consideration for these congenital heart disease patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Tetralogy of Fallot is the most common congenital heart disease in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
- Limited data exists on the efficacy and safety of ICDs in this specific high-risk population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of ICDs in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot.
- To identify risk factors for appropriate ICD discharges.
- To characterize ICD-related complications and mortality rates.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter cohort study involving 121 high-risk patients with Tetralogy of Fallot.
- Patients received ICDs for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
- Follow-up duration was a median of 3.7 years, assessing ICD discharges and complications.
Main Results:
- 30.6% of patients received appropriate ICD discharges, with higher rates in secondary prevention.
- Independent predictors for appropriate shocks in primary prevention included elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.
- Inappropriate shocks occurred annually in 5.8% of patients, and 29.8% experienced complications, primarily late lead-related issues.
Conclusions:
- Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot receiving ICDs experience substantial rates of appropriate shocks for ventricular arrhythmias.
- High incidence of inappropriate shocks and late lead-related complications are significant concerns.
- Annual mortality was 2.2%, with no significant difference between primary and secondary prevention groups.
Background:
Tetralogy of Fallot is the most common form of congenital heart disease in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients, yet little is known about the value of ICDs in this patient population.
Methods And Results:
We conducted a multicenter cohort study in high-risk patients with Tetralogy of Fallot to determine actuarial rates of ICD discharges, identify risk factors, and characterize ICD-related complications. A total of 121 patients (median age 33.3 years; 59.5% male) were enrolled from 11 sites and followed up for a median of 3.7 years. ICDs were implanted for primary prevention in 68 patients (56.2%) and for secondary prevention in 53 (43.8%), defined by clinical sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia or resuscitated sudden death. Overall, 37 patients (30.6%) received at least 1 appropriate and effective ICD discharge, with a median ventricular tachyarrhythmia rate of 213 bpm. Annual actuarial rates of appropriate ICD shocks were 7.7% and 9.8% in primary and secondary prevention, respectively (P=0.11). A higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (hazard ratio 1.3 per mm Hg, P=0.004) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (hazard ratio 3.7, P=0.023) independently predicted appropriate ICD shocks in primary prevention. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 5.8% of patients yearly. Additionally, 36 patients (29.8%) experienced complications, of which 6 (5.0%) were acute, 25 (20.7%) were late lead-related, and 7 (5.8%) were late generator-related complications. Nine patients died during follow-up, which corresponds to an actuarial annual mortality rate of 2.2%, which did not differ between the primary and secondary prevention groups.
Conclusions:
Patients with tetralogy of Fallot and ICDs for primary and secondary prevention experience high rates of appropriate and effective shocks; however, inappropriate shocks and late lead-related complications are common.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

