Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Production of Disulfide-stabilized Transmembrane Peptide Complexes for Structural Studies
Published on: March 6, 2013
Mapping the structural requirements in the CB1 cannabinoid receptor transmembrane helix II for signal transduction
Ankur Kapur1, Patrick Samaniego, Ganesh A Thakur
1California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract:
Amino acid residues in the transmembrane domains of the CB(1) receptor are important for ligand recognition and signal transduction. We used site-directed mutagenesis to identify the role of two novel and adjacent residues in the transmembrane helix II domain, Ile2.62 and Asp2.63. We investigated the role of the conserved, negatively charged aspartate at position 2.63 in cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)) function by substituting it with asparagine (D2.63N) and glutamate (D2.63E). In addition, the effect of the mutant I2.62T alone and in combination with D2.63N (double mutant) on the affinity and potency of structurally diverse ligands was investigated. Recombinant human CB(1) receptors, stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, were assayed for ligand affinity and agonist-stimulated guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding. The charge-conserved mutant D2.63E behaved similar to wild type. The charge-neutralization mutation D2.63N attenuated the potency of (-)-3-[2-hydroxyl-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-[3-hydroxylpropyl] cyclohexan-1-ol (CP,55940), (R)-(-)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthalenyl)methanone (WIN55212-2), (-)-11beta-hydroxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylheptyl) hexahydrocannabinol (AM4056), and (-)-11-hydroxyldimethylheptyl-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol (HU210) for the stimulation of GTPgammaS binding, without affecting their binding affinities. Likewise, the I2.62T mutant selectively altered agonist potency without altering agonist affinity. It was surprising to note that the double mutant (I2.62T-D2.63N) displayed a drastic and synergistic increase (by approximately 50-fold) in the EC(50) for agonist-mediated activation. The profound loss of function in the I2.62T-D2.63N double mutant suggests that, although these residues are not obligatory for agonist recognition, they play a synergistic and crucial role in modulating signal transduction.
More Related Videos
14:02Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells
Published on: April 9, 2018
10:59Visualizing the Conformational Dynamics of Membrane Receptors Using Single-Molecule FRET
Published on: August 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels
α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins
Multi-pass transmembrane proteins such as G-protein-linked receptors (GPCRs) and...
Amplifying Signals via Second Messengers
Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER
Integral transmembrane proteins possess transmembrane and extra membrane domains. The transmembrane domains are primarily made of 20-25 hydrophobic amino acids arranged in a helical secondary confirmation. These...
IP3/DAG Signaling Pathway