Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Computer work duration and its dependence on the used pause definition
Janneke M Richter1, Harm P Slijper, Eelco A B Over
1Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, P.O. Box 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.richter@erasmusmc.nl
Abstract:
Several ergonomic studies have estimated computer work duration using registration software. In these studies, an arbitrary pause definition (Pd; the minimal time between two computer events to constitute a pause) is chosen and the resulting duration of computer work is estimated. In order to uncover the relationship between the used pause definition and the computer work duration (PWT), we used registration software to record usage patterns of 571 computer users across almost 60,000 working days. For a large range of Pds (1-120 s), we found a shallow, log-linear relationship between PWT and Pds. For keyboard and mouse use, a second-order function fitted the data best. We found that these relationships were dependent on the amount of computer work and subject characteristics. Comparison of exposure duration from studies using different pause definitions should take this into account, since it could lead to misclassification. Software manufacturers and ergonomists assessing computer work duration could use the found relationships for software design and study comparison.
Related Concept Videos
Quantifying Work
Power
Power Expended by a Constant Force
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Influence of Elimination Half-Life on Effect Duration
Working Memory

