Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mutational analysis of the putative fusion domain of Ebola virus glycoprotein.

Journal of virology·1999
Same author

Activities of new antimicrobial agents (trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, sanfetrinem, and quinupristin-dalfopristin) against Bacteroides fragilis group: comparison with the activities of 14 other agents.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·1999
Same author

Hyperenhancing focal liver lesions: differential diagnosis with helical CT.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1999
Same author

Formulation strategies for the stabilization of tetanus toxoid in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.

International journal of pharmaceutics·1999
Same author

Post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in Spain.

The Veterinary record·1999
Same author

[Congenital defects of antithrombin III and proteins C and S during pregnancy].

Revista medica de Chile·1999

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

The shared reward dilemma.

J A Cuesta1, R Jiménez, H Lugo

  • 1Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos (GISC), Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, Spain.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|January 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Rewarding cooperation in social dilemmas, like the prisoner

Area of Science:

  • Game Theory
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Cooperation is fundamental to human societies, often incentivized by rewards.
  • Social dilemmas, such as the prisoner's dilemma, model situations where individual and group interests conflict.
  • Understanding the impact of reward distribution on cooperation is crucial for social and economic systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of equally sharing external rewards among cooperators in a prisoner's dilemma game.
  • To analyze the new dilemma faced by individuals when a shared reward is introduced.
  • To classify the equilibria and evolutionary dynamics of this n-player game under varying reward amounts.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical modeling of an n-player prisoner's dilemma game.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

  • Analysis of game equilibria under an external reward system.
  • Examination of evolutionary dynamics to predict long-term behavior.
  • Main Results:

    • The introduction of a shared reward creates a novel dilemma, balancing potential exploitation against collective benefit.
    • The amount of the shared reward significantly influences the emergence of cooperation and defection.
    • A wide range of scenarios arise, from traditional cooperation dynamics to complex, unexpected behaviors.

    Conclusions:

    • Equally sharing rewards among cooperators can alter cooperation dynamics in social dilemmas.
    • The study provides a comprehensive classification of game equilibria and evolutionary outcomes.
    • Findings offer insights into designing effective reward mechanisms to promote cooperation.