Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ranks01:02

Ranks

Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...
Percentile01:18

Percentile

A percentile indicates the relative standing of a data value when data are sorted into numerical order from smallest to largest. It represents the percentages of data values that are less than or equal to the pth percentile. For example, 15% of data values are less than or equal to the 15th percentile. Low percentiles always correspond to lower data values. High percentiles always correspond to higher data values.Percentiles divide ordered data into hundredths. To score in the...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
Partial Fractions01:28

Partial Fractions

A partial fraction is a component of a rational expression represented as the sum of simpler fractions. When a rational function is expressed as a ratio of two polynomials, it can often be decomposed into a sum of fractions whose denominators are simpler polynomials, typically linear or irreducible quadratic factors. This process is called partial fraction decomposition, and it is used to simplify complex expressions for integration, solving equations, or analysis.Partial fraction decomposition...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A global systematic evaluation of the impact of air pollution on pediatric cancer development.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2025
Same author

Biomonitoring of metals in the blood and urine of waste recyclers from exposure to airborne fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>).

Journal of environmental health science & engineering·2024
Same author

Health Risk Assessment of Nitrate in Drinking Water with Potential Source Identification: A Case Study in Almaty, Kazakhstan.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2024
Same author

Partial Order in Environmental Chemistry.

Current computer-aided drug design·2019
Same author

After Salisbury Nerve Agents Revisited.

Molecular informatics·2018
Same author

Assessing and Grouping Chemicals Applying Partial Ordering Alkyl Anilines as an Illustrative Example.

Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening·2018

Related Experiment Videos

Hierarchical partial order ranking.

Lars Carlsen1

  • 1Awareness Center, Hyldeholm 4, Veddelev, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. lc@awarenesscenter.dk

Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
|January 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces hierarchical partial order ranking (HPOR) to simplify complex environmental health impact assessments. HPOR effectively prioritizes chemical risks and polluted sites by grouping parameters and using meta-descriptors for ranking.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science and Risk Assessment
  • Chemical Safety and Toxicology
  • Socio-Environmental Studies

Background:

  • Assessing chemical production/use impacts on health and environment requires multi-criteria evaluation.
  • Numerous parameters (production, release, site factors, substance properties, socio-economics) complicate model development.
  • Existing methods struggle with the high number of variables in risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel method, hierarchical partial order ranking (HPOR), for simplifying complex environmental and human health impact assessments.
  • To address the challenge of integrating a large number of parameters in risk prioritization models.
  • To provide a framework for ranking polluted sites and chemical risks more effectively.

Main Methods:

  • Hierarchical Partial Order Ranking (HPOR) groups initial parameters by interconnections.
  • Meta-descriptors are derived from these groups to represent intermediate rankings.
  • A second ranking is performed on meta-descriptors, with final results based on average ranks.

Main Results:

  • HPOR successfully reduces the complexity of multi-criteria evaluation schemes.
  • The method allows for a sensible model development despite a large number of input parameters.
  • An illustrative example demonstrates the effective prioritization of polluted sites using HPOR.

Conclusions:

  • Hierarchical Partial Order Ranking (HPOR) offers a robust solution for environmental and health risk assessment.
  • The methodology simplifies the integration of diverse parameters, enabling more effective prioritization.
  • HPOR provides a valuable tool for environmental management and public health protection strategies.