Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Detecting deception: the scope and limits
Kamila E Sip1, Andreas Roepstorff, William McGregor
1Center for Functional Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, Building 30, DK-8000 Arhus C, Denmark.
Abstract:
With the increasing interest in the neuroimaging of deception and its commercial application, there is a need to pay more attention to methodology. The weakness of studying deception in an experimental setting has been discussed intensively for over half a century. However, even though much effort has been put into their development, paradigms are still inadequate. The problems that bedevilled the old technology have not been eliminated by the new. Advances will only be possible if experiments are designed that take account of the intentions of the subject and the context in which these occur.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Ethics in Research
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Dark Triad and Person Perception
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

