Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and
Alison L Kitson1, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Gill Harvey
1Green College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HG, UK. alk23@btinternet.com
The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) framework needs further testing. Future work proposes a two-stage approach to tailor interventions for better knowledge translation in implementation science.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Knowledge Translation
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) framework is a widely used heuristic for research and knowledge translation.
- However, the PARiHS framework remains largely untested, limiting its contribution to implementation science theory development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To refine theoretical and methodological approaches in knowledge translation.
- To introduce a typology distinguishing between conceptual framework, theory, and model.
- To propose a two-stage process for utilizing the PARiHS framework.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis and mapping to generate hypotheses.
- Development of a typology from social policy analysis.
- Planning for a two-stage diagnostic and evaluative approach for the PARiHS framework.
Main Results:
- A hypothesis that the PARiHS framework is best used as a two-stage process: diagnostic/evaluative measure of evidence and context, followed by determining facilitation methods.
- The intervention's nature is determined by specific actors, context, time, and place.
- Consideration of wider issues in using theories for research, developing measures, and facilitation.
Conclusions:
- The PARiHS framework should be developed into a two-stage diagnostic and evaluative approach, with interventions shaped by stakeholder-gathered information.
- Suggests forming an international collaborative to test the PARiHS framework and similar approaches.
- Recommends refining definitions of conceptual framework, theory, and model, encouraging broader epistemological and ontological discussions.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Fundamentals of Nursing Process II
