Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

06:57
Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
Published on: May 14, 2019
The effects of consequence manipulation during functional analysis of problem behavior maintained by negative
Kathryn Potoczak1, James E Carr, Jack Michael
1Department of Psychology, Shippensburg University, 1871 Old Main Drive, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania 17257, USA. kmpoto@ship.edu
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|January 15, 2008
Summary
The antecedent-behavior-consequence (ABC) method effectively identified escape behaviors in children with developmental disabilities. In contrast, the AB method, which omits consequences, failed to identify any behavioral functions.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral analysis
- Developmental disabilities
- Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
Background:
- Functional analysis is crucial for understanding and treating problem behaviors.
- Two methods exist: antecedent-behavior-consequence (ABC) and antecedent-behavior (AB).
- The ABC method involves consequence delivery, while the AB method relies solely on antecedents.
Observation:
- This study compared the efficacy of the AB and ABC methods.
- Four children with developmental disabilities exhibiting task-related problem behaviors participated.
- The study focused on identifying the function of these problem behaviors.
Findings:
- The antecedent-behavior-consequence (ABC) method successfully identified an 'escape' function for all four children.
- The antecedent-behavior (AB) method, however, did not identify a function for any of the participants.
- This highlights a significant difference in the diagnostic power of the two methods.
Implications:
- The ABC method appears more effective for identifying the function of problem behaviors in this population.
- Results suggest that consequence delivery is vital for accurate functional analysis.
- Clinicians should consider the ABC method for a comprehensive understanding of problem behavior in children with developmental disabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Behavior Modification
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Reinforcement
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Law of Effect
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

