Development trends for new cancer therapeutics and vaccines
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

A Nonviral Approach to Generate Transient Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Using mRNA for Cancer Immunotherapy
Published on: February 21, 2025
Janice M Reichert1, Julia B Wenger
1Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 75 Kneeland Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02111, United States. janice.reichert@tufts.edu
Abstract:
Global commercial development of cancer treatments has dramatically increased over the past 15 years. To assess trends in the process, we analyzed data for 1111 candidates that entered clinical study during 1990-2006. Our results show that although the average number of therapeutic candidates entering clinical study per year more than doubled, the US approval success rate was low (8%) during the period. The therapeutics took seven years on average to go through the clinical and US approval phases, but cancer vaccines have yet to gain any US approvals. These results indicate that improvement in the efficiency of the development process for innovative cancer treatments is needed.
Insights
Cancer treatment development has increased, but the US approval success rate remains low at 8%. Cancer vaccines have not yet received US approval, highlighting a need for improved drug development efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmaceutical Development
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Global development of cancer treatments has significantly expanded in recent years.
- Assessing trends in cancer therapeutic development is crucial for understanding the drug pipeline.
- The period 1990-2006 saw a rise in candidates entering clinical studies for cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in the commercial development of cancer treatments.
- To evaluate the success rates and timelines of cancer drug candidates in clinical studies and US approval.
- To identify areas for improvement in the cancer drug development process.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data for 1111 cancer therapeutic candidates entering clinical study between 1990 and 2006.
- Examination of trends in the number of therapeutic candidates per year.
- Assessment of US approval success rates and average time for clinical and approval phases.
Main Results:
- The number of cancer therapeutic candidates entering clinical study more than doubled annually.
- The US approval success rate for cancer treatments during the study period was low, at 8%.
- Cancer therapeutics took an average of seven years to complete clinical and US approval phases; cancer vaccines had no US approvals.
Conclusions:
- Despite increased development, the cancer treatment pipeline faces low approval success rates.
- Significant improvements are needed to enhance the efficiency of developing innovative cancer therapies.
- The lack of US approvals for cancer vaccines indicates a specific challenge within this therapeutic class.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...

