Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks.

Timothy J Pleskac1

  • 1Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Indiana, USA. tim.pleskac@gmail.com

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 16, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The cognitive mechanisms behind wishful predictions: A diffusion model decomposition.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Modeling police officers' deadly force decisions in an immersive shooting simulator.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

Cognitive Mechanisms of Aberrant Self-Referential Social Perception in Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder: Insights From Computational Modeling.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2024
Same author

Cognitive Mechanisms of Aberrant Self-Referential Social Perception in Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder: Insights from Computational Modeling.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

A Cognitive Computational Approach to Social and Collective Decision-Making.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

Mathematical modeling of risk-taking in bipolar disorder: Evidence of reduced behavioral consistency, with altered loss aversion specific to those with history of substance use disorder.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)·2023
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study expands a risk-taking model to new tasks, finding that people adapt learning strategies to different environments. Bayesian learning can hinder, while decision-making aids, in identifying risky behaviors like drug use.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Sequential risk-taking paradigms assess real-world risk takers by engaging learning and decision processes.
  • Existing models are limited to specific task types and stochastic environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To generalize a Bayesian sequential risk-taking model to a broader range of tasks and environments.
  • To clarify the distinct roles of learning and decision-making in sequential risky choices.
  • To investigate how individuals adapt their learning and mental representations to varying stochastic conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Expansion of a sequential risk-taking paradigm to include diverse tasks and stochastic environments.
  • Generalization of a Bayesian sequential risk-taking model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of how participants' learning processes and decision-making strategies interact with task characteristics.

    • Main Results:

    • Individuals dynamically adapt their learning processes and mental representations based on the stochastic nature of the environment.
    • Bayesian learning processes were found to interfere with the accurate identification of risky behaviors, such as drug use.
    • The decision-making component of the paradigm proved more diagnostic for identifying risky behaviors.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the interplay between learning and decision-making is crucial for accurately assessing risk-taking behavior.
    • The generalized model offers improved insights into how cognitive processes influence choices in uncertain environments.
    • This research has implications for refining methods used to assess and understand real-world risk-taking behavior.