Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making.

Klaus Fiedler1

  • 1Psychologisches Institut, Universitat Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47-51, 69117, heidelberg, Germany. kf@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 16, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Flexible Diagnosticity in Person Impression Formation: An Integrative Framework.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Pitting base rate driven heuristics against conditional reasoning in multivariate contingency assessment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Rivals reloaded: Adapting to sample-based speed-accuracy trade-offs through competitive pressure.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

An exploration of physics envy with implications for desiderata of psychology theories.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Dynamics of Endothelial Cell Diversity and Plasticity in Health and Disease.

Cells·2024
Same author

Using theoretical constraints and the TASI taxonomy to delineate predictably replicable findings.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

The ultimate sampling dilemma presents a challenge for inductive reasoning in probabilistic environments. Choosing between natural and deliberate information sampling strategies can lead to biases in decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Inductive inferences are crucial for decision-making in uncertain environments.
  • Information sampling strategies significantly impact the accuracy of these inferences.
  • Previous research has not fully addressed the trade-offs inherent in information acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the ultimate sampling dilemma in computer simulations and experiments.
  • To investigate how different sampling strategies affect inductive inferences.
  • To analyze the biases introduced by natural versus deliberate sampling.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized computer simulations to model information sampling.
  • Conducted two experiments where participants made purchasing decisions based on feedback.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed participants' inferences about underlying data distributions after information sampling.

    • Main Results:

    • Both natural and deliberate sampling strategies have inherent advantages and disadvantages.
    • Specific sampling strategies can lead to unbiased inferences for certain tasks but biased inferences for others.
    • The choice of sampling strategy creates a dilemma with trade-offs for inductive reasoning.

    Conclusions:

    • The ultimate sampling dilemma poses a significant obstacle to accurate inductive inference.
    • Understanding these sampling biases is critical for improving decision-making processes.
    • Future research should explore methods to mitigate the negative impacts of sampling dilemmas.