Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing
Published on: September 4, 2016
Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA?
Antonio Moroni1, Lucia Savarino, Matteo Cadossi
1VI Division, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, Italy.
Unlabelled:
Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was introduced as a bone-preserving method of joint reconstruction for young and active patients; however, the large diameter of the bearing surfaces is of concern for potential increased metal ion release. We hypothesized there were no differences in serum concentrations of chromium, cobalt, and molybdenum between patients who had metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (Group A; average head diameter, 48 mm; median followup, 24 months) and patients who had 28-mm metal-on-metal THA (Group B; median followup, 25 months). Serum concentrations also were compared with concentrations in healthy subjects. We identified no differences in ion levels between Groups A and B. A distinction was made according to gender. Women showed a higher chromium release in Group A whereas men had a higher cobalt release in Group B. Values obtained from Group A were higher than those of the control subjects. Our data suggest metal-on-metal bearings for THA should not be rejected because of concern regarding potential increased metal ion release; however, patients with elevated ion levels, even without loosening or toxicity, could be at higher risk and should be followed up periodically.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
09:08Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
Published on: May 14, 2020
08:19Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
Published on: May 17, 2018