Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

New techniques in radical hysterectomy.

Konstantin Zakashansky1, William H Bradley, Farr R Nezhat

  • 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York 10029, USA. konstantin.zakashansky@mssm.edu

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
|January 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential of IMNN-001 in epithelial ovarian cancer: assessment of clinical findings.

Expert opinion on investigational drugs·2026
Same author

A case of perioperative and intraoperative management of a rare vaginal paraganglioma.

Gynecologic oncology reports·2026
Same author

Reproductive Outcomes After Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometriosis in Women with Infertility.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "OVATION-2: A randomized phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of IMNN-001 (IL-12 gene therapy) with neo/adjuvant chemotherapy in patients newly-diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer" [Gynecol Oncol 2025 Jun 197 182-191].

Gynecologic oncology·2025
Same author

Endorsing consensus interpretation for diagnosing placenta accreta spectrum disorders on MRI.

European radiology·2025
Same author

OVATION-2: A randomized phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of IMNN-001 (IL-12 gene therapy) with neo/adjuvant chemotherapy in patients newly-diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2025

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy techniques, including laparoscopic, vaginal, and robotic approaches, offer safe and effective alternatives to abdominal surgery for gynecologic cancers. These methods show promising oncologic outcomes and reduced patient morbidity.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Radical hysterectomy is a cornerstone treatment for gynecologic cancers.
  • Traditional abdominal radical hysterectomy can be associated with significant morbidity.
  • Advancements in surgical technology have led to the development of alternative approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent literature on modifications of abdominal radical hysterectomy.
  • To explore the development and application of laparoscopic, vaginal, and robotic radical hysterectomy.
  • To assess the safety and efficacy of evolving radical hysterectomy techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of recent studies on radical hysterectomy modifications and new approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

  • Analysis of data concerning laparoscopic, vaginal, and robotic radical hysterectomy techniques.
  • Evaluation of reported outcomes, including morbidity, oncologic results, and feasibility.

    • Main Results:

    • Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy reduces postoperative bladder morbidity.
    • Radical vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic lymph node dissection provides excellent cure rates with less morbidity.
    • Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy offers a minimally invasive alternative with reduced blood loss and hospital stay.
    • Robotic radical hysterectomy is gaining acceptance for gynecologic cancer treatment.

    Conclusions:

    • Multiple feasible and safe approaches to radical hysterectomy exist.
    • Preliminary oncologic outcomes for newer techniques are encouraging.
    • Technique selection depends on patient factors, practice setting, and surgeon expertise.