Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Harnessing the Bioorthogonal Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Cycloaddition for Pretargeted PET Imaging
Published on: February 3, 2015
Bombesin receptor antagonists may be preferable to agonists for tumor targeting
Renzo Cescato1, Theodosia Maina, Berthold Nock
1Division of Cell Biology and Experimental Cancer Research, Institute of Pathology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Unlabelled:
Two bombesin analogs, Demobesin 4 and Demobesin 1, were characterized in vitro as gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor agonist and antagonist, respectively, and were compared as (99m)Tc-labeled ligands for their in vitro and in vivo tumor-targeting properties.
Methods:
N(4)-[Pro(1),Tyr(4),Nle(14)]Bombesin (Demobesin 4) and N(4)-[d-Phe(6),Leu-NHEt(13),des-Met(14)]bombesin(6-14) (Demobesin 1) were characterized in vitro for their binding properties with GRP receptor autoradiography using GRP receptor-transfected HEK293 cells, PC3 cells, and human prostate cancer specimens. Their ability to modulate calcium mobilization in PC3 and transfected HEK293 cells was analyzed as well as their ability to trigger internalization of the GRP receptor in transfected HEK293 cells, as determined qualitatively by immunofluorescence microscopy and quantitatively by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Further, their internalization properties as (99m)Tc-labeled radioligands were tested in vitro in both cell lines. Finally, their biodistribution was analyzed in PC3 tumor-bearing mice.
Results:
A comparable binding affinity with the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) in the nanomolar range was measured for Demobesin 4 and Demobesin 1 in all tested tissues. Demobesin 4 behaved as an agonist by strongly stimulating calcium mobilization and by triggering GRP receptor internalization. Demobesin 1 was ineffective in stimulating calcium mobilization and in triggering GRP receptor internalization. However, in these assays, it behaved as a competitive antagonist as it reversed completely the agonist-induced effects in both systems. (99m)Tc-Labeled Demobesin 1 was only weakly taken up by PC3 cells or GRP receptor-transfected HEK293 cells (10% and 5%, respectively, of total added radioactivity) compared with (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 4 (45% of total added radioactivity in both cell lines). Remarkably, the biodistribution study revealed a much more pronounced uptake at 1, 4, and 24 h after injection of (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 1 in vivo into PC3 tumors than (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 4. In vivo competition experiments demonstrated a specific uptake in PC3 tumors and in physiologic GRP receptor-expressing tissues. The tumor-to-kidney ratios were 0.7 for Demobesin 4 and 5.2 for Demobesin 1 at 4 h.
Conclusion:
This comparative in vitro/in vivo study with Demobesin 1 and Demobesin 4 indicates that GRP receptor antagonists may be superior targeting agents to GRP receptor agonists, suggesting a change of paradigm in the field of bombesin radiopharmaceuticals.
Insights
Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor antagonists, like Demobesin 1, show superior tumor targeting compared to agonists (Demobesin 4). This suggests a new approach for developing bombesin radiopharmaceuticals for cancer imaging and therapy.
Area of Science:
- Radiopharmaceutical development
- Molecular imaging
- Cancer therapy
Background:
- Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptors are overexpressed in several human cancers, making them attractive targets for diagnostic and therapeutic agents.
- Bombesin analogs are widely used as ligands for GRP receptors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the in vitro and in vivo tumor-targeting properties of two novel bombesin analogs, Demobesin 4 (agonist) and Demobesin 1 (antagonist).
- To evaluate their potential as (99m)Tc-labeled radioligands for GRP receptor-positive tumors.
Main Methods:
- In vitro characterization of binding affinity, calcium mobilization, and GRP receptor internalization for Demobesin 4 and Demobesin 1.
- In vitro evaluation of internalization of (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 1 and Demobesin 4 in GRP receptor-expressing cells.
- In vivo biodistribution studies of (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 1 and Demobesin 4 in PC3 tumor-bearing mice.
Main Results:
- Both Demobesin 4 and Demobesin 1 exhibited comparable binding affinities in the nanomolar range.
- Demobesin 4 acted as an agonist, stimulating calcium mobilization and GRP receptor internalization, while Demobesin 1 acted as a competitive antagonist.
- (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 1 showed significantly higher tumor uptake and better tumor-to-kidney ratios in vivo compared to (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 4.
Conclusions:
- GRP receptor antagonists, exemplified by Demobesin 1, may serve as superior tumor-targeting agents compared to agonists like Demobesin 4.
- This finding suggests a potential paradigm shift in the development of bombesin-based radiopharmaceuticals for oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Agonist
Agonists can bind to receptors in different ways. Some agonists bind directly to the receptor's active site, mimicking the endogenous ligand's action.
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE). Of...
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue.
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...

