Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026
A Simple Bioassay for the Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
Published on: March 15, 2016
Comparison of vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2 in a swine model of endothelial
Munir Boodhwani1, Pierre Voisine, Marc Ruel
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Objective:
Growth factor based angiogenesis, with or without cell therapy, is a promising therapeutic modality for patients with coronary artery disease. We compared the relative efficacies of surgically delivered vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) in a swine model of hypercholesterolemia-induced endothelial dysfunction which captures many of the pathophysiologic abnormalities of human coronary disease.
Methods:
Yucatan mini-swine (20-30 kg), fed a high cholesterol diet (total 20 weeks), underwent circumflex ameroid placement to create chronic myocardial ischemia, followed three weeks later by perivascular administration of VEGF (2 microg; n=6), FGF-2 (100 microg; n=6), or placebo (n=7) in the ischemic territory. Normocholesterolemic animals (n=7) served as controls. Four weeks later, endothelial function, collateral-dependent perfusion, as well as myocardial protein and mRNA levels of angiogenic mediators were assessed.
Results:
Endothelial dysfunction was observed in all hypercholesterolemic animals as impaired microvessel relaxation in response to adenosine diphosphate and VEGF. VEGF administration improved baseline-adjusted collateral-dependent perfusion at rest (-0.03+/-0.05 vs -0.12+/-0.04, VEGF vs placebo, p=0.09), but FGF-2 delivery caused a significantly greater improvement in perfusion compared to either group (+0.15+/-0.03, p<0.05 vs HC-placebo and HC-VEGF) at rest. Molecular analysis revealed increased eNOS expression (135%+/-8%, p=0.03 vs placebo) in all growth factor treated animals and increased expression of FGF-2 receptor, FGFR1 (65+/-26%, p=0.04 vs placebo), in FGF-2 treated animals. No significant changes were demonstrated in other angiogenic mediators including Akt, Syndecan-4.
Conclusions:
In the setting of hypercholesterolemic endothelial dysfunction, FGF-2 is more effective than VEGF at enhancing collateral-dependent perfusion and thus, may be a better candidate than VEGF for angiogenic therapy in patients with end-stage CAD.
