Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

An Intact Pericardium Ischemic Rodent Model
Published on: September 2, 2021
[Pathological characteristics of dilated hearts with sole myocardial wall damage in recipients]
Hong Zhao1, Feng-ying Lü, Lai-feng Song
1Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular institute and Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Insights
Pathological examination of explanted hearts reveals significant misdiagnosis rates for dilated cardiomyopathy, particularly for arrhythmogenic right ventricular and ischemic cardiomyopathy, highlighting the need for accurate etiological diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Pathology
- Histopathology
- Cardiac Imaging
Context:
- Clinical evaluation and imaging are insufficient for diagnosing dilated cardiomyopathy causes.
- Pathomorphologic examination of cardiac tissue offers improved diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose:
- To compare clinical diagnoses with pathological findings in explanted hearts.
- To identify discrepancies in the diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy etiologies.
Summary:
- Fifty-six explanted hearts underwent gross and histopathological examination.
- Dilated cardiomyopathy was attributed to myocardial wall damage in 67.9% of cases.
- Clinical and pathological diagnoses differed in 39.5% of cases, with high discrepancies in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and giant cell myocarditis.
Impact:
- Highlights frequent misdiagnosis of primary cardiomyopathy, especially arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Emphasizes the necessity of excluding secondary causes for accurate primary cardiomyopathy diagnosis.
- Underscores the critical role of pathological examination in refining cardiomyopathy diagnoses.
Objective:
It is difficult to differentiate the causes of dilated cardiomyopathy only by clinical evaluation and image analysis. Pathomorphologic examinations on diseased hearts may help to improve the diagnosis accuracy.
Methods:
Fifty-six extransplanted hearts from June, 2004 to June, 2006 were examined. Gross and histopathological findings were recorded, photographed and final pathological diagnosis was compared to clinical diagnosis.
Results:
Dilations were caused by sole myocardial wall damage in 38 (67.9%) of the 56 patients, including 19 primary dilated cardiomyopathy, 9 arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, 1 non-compaction cardiomyopathy, 6 ischemic cardiomyopathy, 1 alcoholic cardiomyopathy, 1 hypertensive cardiomyopathy and 1 giant cell myocarditis. The clinical and pathological diagnoses were different in 15 cases (39.5%). The most discrepancies were arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (77.8%), ischemic cardiomyopathy (83.3%), and giant cell myocarditis (100%).
Conclusions:
This pathological study of recipient hearts showed a high portion of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy were misdiagnosed as primary cardiomyopathy. Correct diagnosis of primary cardiomyopathy needs to rule out possible secondary causes of myocardial dilation.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
