Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cohesins02:20

Cohesins

Cohesin protein complexes are a molecular glue that holds two sister chromatids together. They play an important role both in mitosis and meiosis. In mitosis, all cohesin complexes present on the chromosomes are removed before the start of the anaphase stage.
Cohesin complexes in Meiotic Division
Meiosis involves two distinct rounds of chromosomal segregation and cell divisions— Meiosis I followed by Meiosis II – producing four daughter cells. Meiosis I includes the separation of homologous...
Cohesins02:20

Cohesins

Cohesin protein complexes are a molecular glue that holds two sister chromatids together. They play an important role both in mitosis and meiosis. In mitosis, all cohesin complexes present on the chromosomes are removed before the start of the anaphase stage.
Cohesin complexes in Meiotic Division
Meiosis involves two distinct rounds of chromosomal segregation and cell divisions— Meiosis I followed by Meiosis II – producing four daughter cells. Meiosis I includes the separation of homologous...
Anaphase Promoting Complex00:50

Anaphase Promoting Complex

The stepwise destruction of specific proteins is necessary for the progression and completion of the cell cycle. Such proteins are ubiquitinated by ubiquitin ligases and then subsequently destroyed by the proteasome. The SCF (Skp1/Cullin/F-box) and the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) are two important ubiquitin ligases involved in cell cycle progression. While SCF is active throughout the cell cycle, APC gets activated during metaphase to anaphase transition. Cdc20 or Cdh1 binds to APC and...
Anaphase Promoting Complex00:50

Anaphase Promoting Complex

The stepwise destruction of specific proteins is necessary for the progression and completion of the cell cycle. Such proteins are ubiquitinated by ubiquitin ligases and then subsequently destroyed by the proteasome. The SCF (Skp1/Cullin/F-box) and the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) are two important ubiquitin ligases involved in cell cycle progression. While SCF is active throughout the cell cycle, APC gets activated during metaphase to anaphase transition. Cdc20 or Cdh1 binds to APC and...
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint02:19

The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

The spindle assembly checkpoint is a molecular surveillance mechanism ensuring the fidelity of chromosome segregation during anaphase. The checkpoint monitors the completion of all the prerequisite steps before chromosome segregation to determine whether the segregation process should proceed or be delayed.
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
Centrosome Duplication02:25

Centrosome Duplication

The primary microtubule organizing center (MTOC) in animal cells is the centrosome. A centrosome has two cylindrical centrioles at its core. Each centriole consists of nine sets of three microtubules held together by proteins. The centrioles are positioned at right angles to each other and surrounded by a shapeless protein cloud called the pericentriolar matrix, or pericentriolar material (PCM).
To ensure that each daughter cell receives a centrosome after cell division, centrosome duplication...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Competition shapes the landscape of X-chromosome-linked genetic diversity.

Nature genetics·2024
Same author

Structural basis of centromeric cohesion protection.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2023
Same author

Structural insights into p300 regulation and acetylation-dependent genome organisation.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Nuclear condensates of p300 formed though the structured catalytic core can act as a storage pool of p300 with reduced HAT activity.

Nature communications·2021
Same author

The structure of the cohesin ATPase elucidates the mechanism of SMC-kleisin ring opening.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2020
Same author

The structural basis for cohesin-CTCF-anchored loops.

Nature·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Super-Resolution Microscopy of the Synaptonemal Complex Within the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline
09:14

Super-Resolution Microscopy of the Synaptonemal Complex Within the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline

Published on: September 13, 2022

The enhanceosome.

Daniel Panne1

  • 1EMBL, 6 Rue Jules Horowitz, BP181, 38042 Grenoble, France. panne@embl.fr

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|January 22, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This article examines how a specific group of proteins, known as the interferon-beta enhanceosome, works together to control gene activity. By analyzing the atomic structure of these proteins bound to DNA, researchers explain how they function as a single unit to trigger immune responses. The findings highlight how DNA shape changes and helper proteins facilitate this complex process.

Keywords:
Gene ExpressionStructural BiologyDNA Binding ProteinsImmune Response

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Dissection of Enhancer Function Using Multiplex CRISPR-based Enhancer Interference in Cell Lines
10:46

Dissection of Enhancer Function Using Multiplex CRISPR-based Enhancer Interference in Cell Lines

Published on: June 2, 2018

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
06:02

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: October 28, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Super-Resolution Microscopy of the Synaptonemal Complex Within the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline
09:14

Super-Resolution Microscopy of the Synaptonemal Complex Within the Caenorhabditis elegans Germline

Published on: September 13, 2022

Dissection of Enhancer Function Using Multiplex CRISPR-based Enhancer Interference in Cell Lines
10:46

Dissection of Enhancer Function Using Multiplex CRISPR-based Enhancer Interference in Cell Lines

Published on: June 2, 2018

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
06:02

A Computational Pipeline for Intergenic/Intragenic Enhancer RNA Quantification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Published on: October 28, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology of the interferon-beta enhanceosome
  • Transcriptional regulation and gene expression systems

Background:

The mechanisms governing eukaryotic gene regulation remain incompletely understood despite extensive investigation. Prior research has shown that transcription factor complexes integrate diverse cellular signals. That uncertainty drove interest in how specific protein assemblies recognize regulatory DNA sequences. No prior work had resolved the precise atomic architecture of the interferon-beta enhanceosome. This gap motivated detailed structural analysis to clarify protein-DNA interactions. It was already known that multiple factors bind to enhancer regions to initiate transcription. Scientists previously hypothesized that these proteins might interact directly with each other to maintain stability. This study addresses how these components organize themselves on the genome to ensure precise gene control.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to elucidate the structural basis of the interferon-beta enhanceosome. Researchers sought to understand how transcription factor complexes integrate cellular signals at the protein-DNA interface. This work addresses the specific problem of how multiple proteins coordinate their binding to a single enhancer. The motivation stems from the need to explain how these complexes function as a unified regulatory unit. No prior work had successfully modeled the atomic interactions of this specific enhanceosome. That uncertainty drove the authors to analyze how binding site overlap contributes to complex stability. The study investigates why this regulatory region remains highly conserved across mammalian species. By clarifying these mechanisms, the authors hope to provide a paradigm for eukaryotic signal integration.

Main Methods:

Review approach involves synthesizing recent structural data to build a complete atomic model. Researchers examined the protein-DNA interface to determine how individual factors organize on the genome. The investigation utilized high-resolution structural information to map the binding of eight transcription factors. Analysts assessed the spatial arrangement of these proteins relative to the enhancer DNA sequence. The team evaluated the extent of binding site overlap to characterize the composite regulatory element. Review approach included comparing the observed protein-DNA contacts with known evolutionary conservation patterns in mammals. Scientists scrutinized the lack of direct protein-protein interfaces within the complex. The study integrated findings regarding coactivator protein involvement to explain the cooperative binding mechanism.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature demonstrate that the enhanceosome forms a continuous recognition surface through the binding of eight transcription factors. The structural model reveals that these proteins occupy overlapping sites on the enhancer DNA. The analysis shows that the complex operates as a single unit of regulation rather than as independent components. Key findings from the literature indicate an absence of major protein-protein interfaces between the transcription factors. The researchers report that cooperative binding is achieved through binding-induced conformational changes in the DNA structure. The study highlights that the complex makes contacts with virtually every nucleotide within the enhancer region. Key findings from the literature establish that these extensive contacts explain the high level of evolutionary conservation. The results confirm that interactions with coactivators like CBP/p300 are necessary for the stability of the entire assembly.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the interferon-beta enhanceosome functions as a unified regulatory entity. Synthesis and implications suggest that binding site overlap creates a singular recognition surface for transcription factors. The researchers indicate that cooperative assembly relies heavily on DNA conformational shifts rather than direct protein-protein contacts. This review highlights how interactions with coactivator proteins like CBP/p300 stabilize the complex on the enhancer. The authors conclude that the extensive nucleotide contacts explain the evolutionary conservation observed in mammalian genomes. These findings provide a structural basis for understanding how eukaryotic cells integrate complex signaling pathways. The study confirms that the enhanceosome acts as a paradigm for signal integration in gene regulation. Future interpretations should focus on how these architectural features influence the timing of immune responses.

The researchers propose that the complex functions as a singular regulatory unit. This occurs because eight transcription factors bind to overlapping sites, creating a continuous surface on the DNA that facilitates coordinated gene activation.

The authors identify CBP/p300 as a key coactivator. These proteins interact with the transcription factors to stabilize the assembly on the enhancer DNA, which is necessary for the complex to function effectively.

The researchers state that the enhancer is evolutionary conserved because the transcription factors make contacts with almost every nucleotide. This high degree of specificity ensures that the regulatory region remains stable across mammalian genomes.

The authors utilize atomic models to show that the enhanceosome lacks major protein-protein interfaces. Instead, they suggest that cooperative binding is driven by DNA structural changes induced by the transcription factors themselves.

The study reveals that the enhanceosome is composed of eight distinct transcription factors. These proteins bind to the enhancer DNA to form a continuous recognition surface that acts as a single regulatory unit.

The authors claim that the enhanceosome serves as a model for understanding signal integration. They suggest that this complex architecture allows eukaryotic cells to process multiple inputs to regulate gene expression accurately.