Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Expect the unexpected: failure to anticipate similarities leads to an intergroup forecasting error
Robyn K Mallett1, Timothy D Wilson, Daniel T Gilbert
1Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60626-5385, USA. rmallett@luc.edu
Abstract:
People often expect interactions with outgroup members to go poorly, but little research examines the accuracy of these expectations, reasons why expectations might be negatively biased, and ways to bring expectations in line with experiences. The authors found that intergroup interactions were more positive than people expected them to be (Pilot Study, Study 1). One reason for this intergroup forecasting error is that people focus on their dissimilarities with outgroup members (Study 1). When the authors focused White participants' attention on the ways they were similar to a Black participant, their intergroup expectations changed to match their positive experiences (Studies 2 & 3). Regardless of focus, Whites expected to have pleasant intragroup interactions, and they were accurate (Study 4).
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Fundamental Attribution Error
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
The Representativeness Heuristic
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Cause and Effect