Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data sharing in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: suboptimal data availability despite "data available upon request".

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

UK National Screening Committee position statement on surrogate outcomes in cancer screening trials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

CRT-Estimands Framework: consensus based extension of the ICH E9(R1) addendum for cluster randomised trials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Evaluation of metformin for epilepsy prevention or seizure control in people without evidence of diabetes: retrospective cohort study.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same author

Seizure prophylaxis in glioma surgery (SPRING): A multi-center, unblinded, randomized trial.

Neuro-oncology practice·2026
Same author

Supported implementation enhances injury prevention programme (Prep-to-Play) use in women and girls playing Australian Football: a pragmatic type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

British journal of sports medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Open label extension studies and patient selection biases.

Karla Hemming1, Jane L Hutton, Melissa J Maguire

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK. karla@stats.warwick.ac.uk

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|January 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Open label extension studies may overestimate treatment effects due to patient selection bias. A new analysis method minimizes this bias, revealing potentially lower efficacy than initially reported in chronic disease interventions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacovigilance

Background:

  • Long-term observational studies are crucial for assessing chronic disease interventions.
  • Concerns exist regarding the scientific validity of open label extension studies.
  • Patient withdrawal due to adverse events can skew results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address concerns about the scientific validity of open label extension studies.
  • To propose an alternative analysis method for open label extension studies.
  • To minimize patient selection biases in long-term study reporting.

Main Methods:

  • Outlined the standard analysis of open label extension studies.
  • Demonstrated that ignoring non-continuing patients assumes data are missing completely at random.
  • Proposed an alternative analysis method not reliant on this assumption.

Main Results:

  • Standard analysis can lead to biased treatment effect estimates.
  • An example showed a reported responder rate of 43% reduced to 28% with bias-corrected analysis.
  • Patient selection biases can significantly impact reported efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed analysis method effectively minimizes patient selection biases.
  • Recommendations for future reporting of open label extension studies are provided.
  • Sensitivity analysis for worst-case scenarios is suggested for minimum treatment effect estimation.