Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and the...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan01:30

Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan

Description
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography01:24

Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

IntroductionUltrasonography, or renal ultrasound, is a noninvasive medical imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to visualize the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and surrounding tissues.Indications for Urinary System UltrasonographyUrinary system ultrasonography is indicated in various clinical scenarios, such as:Kidney Stones (Urolithiasis): To detect and monitor the size and presence of kidney or urinary tract stones.Hydronephrosis: To assess the dilation of the renal pelvis and...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance of Statistical and Machine Learning Risk Prediction Models for Advanced Breast Cancers.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Timeliness of Follow-Up in Breast Cancer Screening.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Trends in Pediatric Imaging From 1997 to 2024 in an Integrated Health Care Setting.

Hospital pediatrics·2026
Same author

In what clinical settings are the MASAI trial results applicable?

Nature reviews. Clinical oncology·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Density-Targeted Supplemental Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening by Breast Cancer Risk: Long-Term Health and Economic Considerations.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Acceptability of a practical geriatric assessment intervention with older adult cancer survivors and community health workers/promotoras: a qualitative investigation.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Physician workload in mammography.

Rebecca Smith-Bindman1, Diana L Miglioretti, Robert Rosenberg

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, China Basin Landing, 185 Berry St., Ste. 350, Lobby 7, Campus Box 0946, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|January 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Most radiologists interpret more than the required 480 mammograms annually. Increasing the annual mammography interpretation requirement to 2,000 could reduce access, especially in rural areas.

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Current United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines mandate radiologists interpret at least 960 mammography examinations every two years (approx. 480 annually).
  • Mammography interpretation volume is a key metric for quality assurance and certification.
  • Understanding physician interpretive volumes is crucial for assessing the impact of regulatory changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate the annual mammography interpretation volumes per physician across the United States.
  • To analyze the distribution of mammography interpretations among radiologists with varying caseloads.
  • To evaluate the potential impact of increased mammography interpretation volume requirements on overall capacity and access.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 4.2 million mammography examinations from 196 facilities between 1998 and 2004.
  • Calculation of per-physician annual interpretive volumes.
  • Modeling the effect of increased minimum annual volume requirements on mammography capacity.

Main Results:

  • The mean annual mammographic interpretive volume was 1,777 examinations per radiologist.
  • Approximately 31% of radiologists interpreted fewer than 1,000 mammograms annually, accounting for only 10% of total interpretations.
  • Increasing the minimum annual requirement to 2,000 mammograms could eliminate 47% of current mammography capacity, necessitating significant workload redistribution.

Conclusions:

  • Doubling the annual volume requirement would have a minimal impact on overall mammography capacity.
  • Raising the annual requirement to 2,000 mammograms would disproportionately affect higher-volume radiologists and could significantly reduce mammography capacity.
  • Potential increases in mammography interpretation requirements could curtail access, particularly for rural populations, unless low-volume radiologists increase their caseloads.