Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Future directions and research needs.

W H Farland1

  • 1Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460.

Environmental Health Perspectives
|November 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Guest Editorial. Cancer risk assessment: Evolution in a fishbowl.

Environmental science & technology·2011
Same author

Rodent toxicity and nongenotoxic carcinogenesis: knowledge-based human risk assessment based on molecular mechanisms.

Toxicology mechanisms and methods·2009
Same author

Contrasting roles of epidemiology in dioxin-related policy: lessons learned.

American journal of epidemiology·2001
Same author

The paradoxes ofMTBE.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2001
Same author

Biological effects of low-level exposures: a perspective from U.S. EPA scientists.

Environmental health perspectives·1998
Same author

Methylmercury risks.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1998
Same journal

A New Start.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
See all related articles

This study outlines the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) indoor air research strategy, focusing on monitoring, health effects, and risk assessment to protect public health from indoor air pollution.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health Sciences
  • Public Health
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Indoor air quality significantly impacts public health and living environments.
  • Scientific inquiry into indoor air issues requires specialized expertise for research and data interpretation.
  • High-quality scientific information is crucial for effective environmental risk assessment and management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) strategic research directions for indoor air pollution assessment and control.
  • To inform Congress about critical needs in understanding and mitigating indoor air contaminants.

Main Methods:

  • The EPA's indoor air research strategy encompasses five key areas: monitoring/building studies, health effects, source characterization/mitigation, health impact/risk assessment, and program management/technology transfer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of major trends and research needs, including noncancer effects, multiple low-level pollutants, and sensitive detection methods.

    • Main Results:

    • The EPA's research strategy addresses critical aspects of indoor air quality from monitoring to risk management.
    • Identified needs include a greater focus on noncancer health effects and the cumulative impact of multiple pollutants.
    • Emphasis on developing more sensitive methods to identify adverse health effects in sensitive individuals and subgroups.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective management of indoor air pollution requires a comprehensive research strategy.
    • Future research should prioritize understanding complex exposures and their health impacts on vulnerable populations.
    • Advancements in detection and assessment are needed for better characterization of health risks associated with indoor air quality.