Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Grasping at 'thin air': multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping.

Experimental brain research·2007
Same author

A reexamination of the size-weight illusion induced by visual size cues.

Experimental brain research·2006
Same author

Effects of assembling virtual fixtures on learning a navigation task.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2006
Same author

Grip forces when passing an object to a partner.

Experimental brain research·2005
Same author

On defining metrics for assessing laparoscopic surgical skills in a virtual training environment.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2004
Same author

Grasping an augmented object to analyse manipulative force control.

Ergonomics·2003
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Auditory contact cues improve performance when grasping augmented and virtual objects with a tool.

Mihaela A Zahariev1, Christine L Mackenzie

  • 1School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada, V5A 1S6. mihaela_z@alumni.sfu.ca

Experimental Brain Research
|January 25, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores how sound and touch help people grasp virtual or augmented objects using a tool. Researchers found that adding sound cues when the tool touches an object makes movements faster and more accurate, especially when physical touch feedback is missing.

Keywords:
sensory feedbackmotor controlhaptic perceptionkinematicsaugmented reality

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction research within auditory contact cues perception
  • Sensory integration studies in cognitive psychology

Background:

Prior research has shown that sensory feedback influences how humans interact with objects in digital environments. No prior work had resolved how auditory signals compensate for missing physical sensations during tool-use tasks. That uncertainty drove this investigation into multisensory integration. It was already known that physical touch provides critical information for grasping. However, the role of sound in virtual settings remained poorly understood. This gap motivated a closer look at how different sensory inputs affect movement control. Researchers often struggle to replicate natural grasping behaviors in synthetic spaces. Understanding these mechanisms helps improve the design of immersive interfaces.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to determine how haptic and auditory feedback influence grasping performance when using a tool. Researchers sought to understand the specific contributions of these sensory inputs in augmented and virtual environments. This investigation addressed the challenge of maintaining natural motor control when physical sensations are limited. The team examined whether sound could serve as a functional substitute for touch during object manipulation. They hypothesized that multisensory integration would improve both the speed and accuracy of reaching movements. This work targeted the underlying mechanisms of human-computer interaction in digital spaces. By comparing different feedback conditions, the authors identified how sensory information shapes movement execution. The motivation was to provide evidence for enhancing user interfaces in synthetic reality applications.

Main Methods:

Review Approach involved a controlled experiment testing human reaching and grasping behaviors. Participants used a handheld instrument to interact with both physical-graphic and purely digital targets. The team manipulated the presence of sensory feedback to isolate the effects of sound and touch. Researchers recorded kinematic data to analyze movement speed and trajectory. Spatial precision was assessed by measuring the final position of the tool relative to the target. The experimental design included trials with and without sound triggers at the moment of impact. This approach allowed for a direct comparison between augmented and virtual conditions. Statistical analysis determined the impact of sensory variables on motor performance metrics.

Main Results:

Key Findings From the Literature reveal that sound signals significantly reduce movement duration during grasping tasks. When haptic feedback was unavailable, auditory cues improved spatial accuracy for virtual targets. Movement times increased as object size decreased for augmented items, consistent with Fitts' law. This pattern also emerged for virtual objects when sound cues were provided. However, movement times remained uniform across all object sizes when both haptic and auditory information were absent. The data indicate that sound successfully compensates for the lack of physical touch. These results demonstrate that sensory integration is a primary factor in successful tool-mediated grasping. The study confirms that auditory feedback enhances performance in synthetic environments.

Conclusions:

Synthesis and Implications suggest that sensory feedback remains a primary driver of motor performance during tool-mediated interactions. The authors propose that sound signals effectively substitute for physical touch when users manipulate digital items. These findings indicate that auditory cues enhance spatial precision in environments lacking haptic feedback. The evidence supports the idea that multisensory inputs facilitate faster movement execution. Researchers maintain that the absence of contact information leads to suboptimal grasping strategies. This synthesis highlights how sound bridges the gap between virtual and physical object manipulation. The authors conclude that integrating auditory signals improves user efficiency across various digital platforms. These insights provide a framework for future interface development in augmented reality systems.

The researchers propose that auditory cues enhance movement speed and spatial accuracy. When haptic feedback is absent, sound signals provide necessary information to guide the tool tip, resulting in improved performance compared to conditions where no sensory feedback is provided at the moment of contact.

The study utilized a tool to manipulate objects of varying sizes. This tool acted as the primary interface for reaching and grasping, allowing the researchers to measure transport kinematics and spatial errors across both augmented and virtual object conditions.

The authors suggest that auditory cues are necessary to maintain performance levels similar to physical interactions. Without either haptic or auditory feedback, movement times failed to scale with object size, indicating a breakdown in the expected motor control patterns described by Fitts' law.

Spatial errors serve as a key metric for evaluating accuracy. By comparing trials with and without sound, the team determined that auditory feedback significantly reduces the distance between the tool tip and the target object, particularly for virtual items.

The researchers observed that movement times followed Fitts' law when haptic or auditory feedback was present. In contrast, when both sensory cues were removed, the relationship between object size and movement duration disappeared, demonstrating the influence of sensory input on motor timing.

The authors imply that designers should incorporate sound to improve user experience in virtual environments. They argue that auditory feedback compensates for the lack of physical resistance, which is a common limitation in current augmented and virtual reality systems.