Identifying stabilizing key residues in proteins using interresidue interaction energy matrix
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
Lada Bendová-Biedermannová1, Pavel Hobza, Jirí Vondrásek
1Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and Center for Biomolecules and Complex Molecular Systems, Flemingovo nám. 2, Prague, Czech Republic.
Abstract:
We are proposing an interresidue interaction energy map (IEM)--a new tool for protein structure analysis and protein bioinformatics. This approach employs the sum of pair-wise interaction energies of a particular residue as a measure of its structural importance. We will show that the IEM can serve as a means for identifying key residues responsible for the stability of a protein. Our method can be compared with the interresidue contact map but has the advantage of weighting the contacts by the stabilization energy content which they bring to the protein structure. For the theoretical adjustment of the proposed method, we chose the Trp-cage mini protein as a model system to compare a spectrum of computational methods ranging from the ab initio MP2 level through the DFT method to empirical force-field methods. The IEM method correctly identifies Tryptophane 6 as the key residue in the Trp-cage. The other residues with the highest stabilizing contributions correspond to the structurally important positions in the protein. We have further tested our method on the Trp2Cage miniprotein--a P12W mutant of the Trp-cage and on two proteins from the rubredoxin family that differ in their thermostability. Our method correctly identified the thermodynamically more stable variants in both cases and therefore can also be used as a tool for the relative measurement of protein stability. Finally, we will point out the important role played by dispersion energy, which contributes significantly to the total stabilization energy and whose role in aromatic pairs is clearly dominant. Surprisingly, the dispersion energy plays an even more important role in the interaction of prolines with aromatic systems.
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Energy Diagrams, Transition States, and Intermediates
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
