Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data.

Shane B McLaughlin1, Jonathan M Hankey, Thomas A Dingus

  • 1Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA. smclaughlin@vtti.vt.edu

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|January 25, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the impact of driving automation systems on distracted driving behaviors.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2021
Same author

Parent and Teen Factors Associated with the Amount and Variety of Supervised Practice Driving.

Safety science·2020
Same author

Crash rates over time among younger and older drivers in the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.

Journal of safety research·2020
Same author

The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2018
Same author

A validation of the low mileage bias using naturalistic driving study data.

Journal of safety research·2017
Same author

Factors Influencing Learner Permit Duration.

Safety (Basel, Switzerland)·2017
Same journal

Modeling road-segment-level speeding risk of new energy vehicle taxis using a multistage framework with spatial spillover, endogeneity, and nonlinear effects.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Role of streetscape feature in pedestrian safety: A modified multi-level multiple membership model.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Assessing autonomous driving performance and environmental influencing factors using real-world operational trajectory data.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Multi-scale modeling of electric vehicle fatal crash risk: uncovering spatial heterogeneity and infrastructure-land use coupling mechanisms.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Differential sensitivity of self-reported driving and collision measures to aspects of shiftwork, sleep, and fatigue.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same journal

Delving into the visual attention of pedestrians during street crossing under time pressure: An eye-tracking approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new method to evaluate collision avoidance systems (CASs) using real-world crash data. It assesses CAS performance without driver assumptions, enabling broader applicability and guiding future development.

Area of Science:

  • Automotive Safety Engineering
  • Human Factors in Transportation
  • Intelligent Transportation Systems

Background:

  • Evaluating collision avoidance systems (CASs) is crucial for improving road safety.
  • Existing methods often rely on specific assumptions about driver reaction times and inputs, limiting generalizability.
  • Naturalistic driving data from real crashes and near-crashes offers a valuable, unbiased dataset for performance evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel method for evaluating CAS performance using naturalistic driving data.
  • To develop an evaluation framework that minimizes assumptions about driver perception and response.
  • To provide a basis for comparing different CAS technologies and guiding future system development.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized naturalistic driving data from actual crash and near-crash events.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Integrated crash data into alert models to determine alert timing.
  • Performed kinematic analysis to establish required avoidance response times.
  • Calculated the percentage of the population capable of avoiding the event based on available time.
  • Assessed the frequency of alerts generated by the CAS.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method allows for the evaluation of CAS performance without making specific assumptions about driver reaction times or response inputs.
    • Findings can be generalized beyond the performance of individual drivers involved in the events.
    • The method facilitates direct comparison of different CAS performances and offers insights for system enhancement.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method provides a robust framework for evaluating collision avoidance systems using real-world driving data.
    • It enables objective performance assessment and comparison, crucial for advancing automotive safety.
    • The approach is applicable to various CAS types, including Forward Collision Warning systems, and supports informed development strategies.