Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interoperator variability in quantitative electroencephalography.

M A Hamilton-Bruce1, K L Boundy, G H Purdie

  • 1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville.

Clinical and Experimental Neurology
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced posterior cingulate binding of I-123 iodo-dexetimide to muscarinic receptors in mild Alzheimer's disease.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2005
Same author

Pharmacological treatment of cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease.

The Medical journal of Australia·2001
Same author

Localization of temporal lobe epileptic foci with iodine-123 iododexetimide cholinergic neuroreceptor single-photon emission computed tomography.

Neurology·1996
Same author

Human dosimetry and biodistribution of iodine-123-iododexetimide: a SPECT imaging agent for cholinergic muscarinic neuroreceptors.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1995
Same author

Calibration assessment in quantitative electroencephalographic brainmapping and evoked potential studies.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·1994
Same author

Quality assurance in a neurophysiology laboratory.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·1994
Same journal

Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer-type of cerebral degenerations in Chinese.

Clinical and experimental neurology·1994
Same journal

Primary cerebral abscess due to Nocardia asteroides presenting as stroke.

Clinical and experimental neurology·1994
Same journal

Rhinocerebral mucormycosis presenting as periorbital cellulitis with blindness: report of 2 cases.

Clinical and experimental neurology·1994
Same journal

Routine use of lamotrigine, a new anti-epileptic medication, and the value of measuring its blood levels.

Clinical and experimental neurology·1994
Same journal

Isaac's syndrome: report of a case responding to valproic acid.

Clinical and experimental neurology·1994
Same journal

Huntington's disease in Hong Kong Chinese: epidemiology and clinical picture.

Clinical and experimental neurology·1994
See all related articles

Quantitative electroencephalograph (EEG) analysis shows minimal variation between operators. This study found no significant differences in discriminant or raw EEG measures, ensuring reliable data interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Technology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) analysis involves complex data interpretation.
  • Operator variability can potentially impact the reliability of qEEG findings.
  • Standardized analysis protocols are crucial for consistent qEEG results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the inter-operator reliability of quantitative and discriminant electroencephalograph (EEG) analysis.
  • To determine if different operators yield significantly different results from the same EEG data.
  • To evaluate the impact of operator variability on EEG data interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • EEG recordings from 10 healthy volunteers using the 10-20 system.
  • Independent analysis of artifact-free EEG epochs by three different operators.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis using non-parametric Friedman's two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were found between operators in discriminant EEG analysis (7/10 studies yielded identical results).
    • ANOVA revealed no significant differences in monopolar and bipolar Absolute Power measures between operators (P = 0.05).
    • Variability was slightly higher in Absolute Power compared to Relative Power, Power Asymmetry, and Coherence, but remained non-significant.

    Conclusions:

    • Operator differences in quantitative EEG analysis are non-significant for both raw measures and discriminant analyses.
    • The findings support the reliability of quantitative EEG analysis across different operators.
    • This suggests that standardized qEEG interpretation protocols can yield consistent results.