Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tumor detection in nonstationary backgrounds.

R N Strickland1

  • 1Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ.

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Two novel detectors were developed for locating simulated tumors in gamma-ray images. A curvature-based detector excels at identifying small tumors, achieving 95% true positive rates.

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconstruction of an axisymmetric image from its blurred and noisy projection.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Optical flow computation in combustion image sequences.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Rectification and enhancement of three severely distorted images of Jupiter's north polar region.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Channelized detection filters.

Optics letters·1997
Same author

Wavelet transform methods for object detection and recovery.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·1997
Same author

Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·1996

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Image Analysis

Background:

  • Clinical gamma-ray imaging is crucial for detecting tumors.
  • Identifying small tumors against complex backgrounds remains challenging.
  • Existing detection methods require improvement for enhanced accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate two novel detectors for simulated tumor detection in gamma-ray images.
  • To compare the performance of these detectors against established methods.
  • To assess the effectiveness of detectors in suppressing background noise.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a curvature-based detector analyzing image data as a relief map.
  • Implementation of an adaptive prewhitening matched filter using statistical scaling.
  • Testing detectors with simulated Gaussian tumors on clinical gamma-ray images.

Main Results:

  • The curvature detector outperformed the matched filter for small tumors (<3 pixels).
  • A 95% true positive rate with one false positive per image was achieved for tumors with SNR >= 2.
  • For larger tumors, Pratt's statistical correlation function demonstrated superior performance.

Conclusions:

  • The curvature detector offers a promising approach for detecting small simulated tumors in gamma-ray imaging.
  • Detector performance is dependent on tumor size and signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Further research may involve refining these detectors for clinical application.

Related Experiment Videos