Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Circadian rhythms: from gene expression to behavior.

J S Takahashi1

  • 1Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208.

Current Opinion in Neurobiology
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This review examines recent progress in understanding how internal biological clocks function across different species. It highlights new laboratory models, the role of specific genes in timing behavior, and the discovery that diverse organisms share a common protein-based mechanism for maintaining daily cycles.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author Correction: Universal DNA methylation age across mammalian tissues.

Nature aging·2023
Same author

Universal DNA methylation age across mammalian tissues.

Nature aging·2023
Same author

Molecular components of the circadian clock in mammals.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2015
Same author

Depressive-like behavior and stress reactivity are independent traits in a Wistar Kyoto x Fisher 344 cross.

Molecular psychiatry·2003
Same author

Overview of circadian rhythms.

Alcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism·2001
Same author

Stopping time: the genetics of fly and mouse circadian clocks.

Annual review of neuroscience·2001

Area of Science:

  • Chronobiology research within circadian rhythms
  • Molecular genetics and cellular biology

Background:

Biological systems rely on internal timing mechanisms to coordinate physiological activities with environmental cycles. No prior work had fully resolved how these temporal processes integrate across diverse species. Researchers previously lacked comprehensive models to observe these oscillations in controlled settings. That uncertainty drove the development of novel experimental platforms for studying cellular timing. Understanding the molecular basis of these cycles remains a significant challenge for modern biology. Prior research has shown that various organisms exhibit rhythmic behavior, yet the underlying genetic drivers were unclear. This gap motivated scientists to investigate the specific proteins involved in cycle regulation. Recent advancements have begun to clarify how these systems operate from microscopic levels to complex organismal behaviors.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to synthesize recent advancements in the understanding of circadian oscillators. Researchers seek to clarify how cellular processes generate and regulate these rhythmic behaviors. This study addresses the need to integrate findings from various model systems into a coherent framework. The authors investigate how molecular events translate into organismal timing. They focus on identifying common themes that span across different biological classes. This work aims to highlight the significance of recent discoveries regarding gene expression and protein synthesis. By evaluating new in vitro models, the team clarifies the current state of the field. The review provides a comprehensive look at the mechanisms that govern daily cycles in living systems.

Keywords:
chronobiologymolecular oscillatorsgene expressiontemporal regulation

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that a common timing mechanism relies on the expression of specific clock proteins. This process functions across diverse organisms, including vertebrates, mollusks, and Drosophila, to regulate daily physiological cycles.

Immediate-early genes are identified as potential regulators of behavioral timing. These components appear to influence how organisms respond to environmental cues through their activity within the cellular clock system.

The authors define specific periods for macromolecular synthesis as necessary for the clock to progress through its cycle. Without this synthesis during these windows, the timing mechanism fails to advance correctly.

New in vitro model systems allow scientists to observe and manipulate oscillators in controlled environments. These platforms provide the technical capacity to test how cellular components interact to produce rhythmic outputs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach involves synthesizing recent literature regarding cellular and molecular timing. Authors evaluate data derived from diverse model organisms to identify shared regulatory patterns. This analysis focuses on advancements in laboratory techniques for observing rhythmic oscillations. Investigators compare findings from vertebrates, mollusks, and fruit flies to establish commonalities. The team examines how specific genetic expressions correlate with observed behavioral changes. They assess the impact of macromolecular synthesis windows on the progression of internal cycles. This methodology prioritizes studies that utilize novel in vitro systems for tracking oscillator activity. The synthesis integrates these varied experimental outcomes to construct a unified view of temporal regulation.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that diverse species utilize a common theme involving clock protein expression to drive timing. Research confirms that immediate-early genes play a potential regulatory role in governing behavioral outputs. Studies have successfully defined specific windows for macromolecular synthesis that allow the clock to advance through its cycle. New in vitro systems now enable more precise observation of these oscillators than previous methods allowed. Investigations into the Drosophila period gene offer fresh perspectives on the underlying timing machinery. Data across vertebrates and mollusks support the conclusion that these protein-based mechanisms are widespread. The literature demonstrates that these processes operate at multiple levels of organization within living systems. These results collectively highlight a conserved logic in how organisms maintain their daily internal schedules.

Conclusions:

The authors synthesize evidence suggesting that a conserved protein-based system governs timing across disparate species. This review highlights that vertebrates, mollusks, and insects share fundamental regulatory strategies for their internal clocks. Researchers propose that the expression of specific proteins serves as the primary driver for these biological oscillations. The findings imply that timing mechanisms are deeply rooted in evolutionary history. Synthesis of these studies suggests that immediate-early genes may influence behavioral outputs in ways previously unrecognized. The authors note that defining specific windows for macromolecular synthesis helps map the progression of these cycles. These insights provide a framework for future investigations into the universality of biological timing. The evidence points toward a shared logic in how living systems maintain daily rhythms.

The Drosophila period gene serves as a model to gain insight into the clock mechanism. Studies of this specific gene help clarify how genetic expression translates into observable rhythmic behavior.

The authors suggest that the existence of a shared protein-based timing system across different species implies a common evolutionary origin for these biological clocks. This observation links molecular processes directly to organismal behavior.