Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
Published on: April 25, 2025
[Prevalence of intestinal parasites among workers in food sector in Van region]
Muhammet Güzel Kurtoğlu1, Hanifi Körkoca, Mutalip Ciçek
1Van Il Sağlik Müdürlüğü, Halk Sağliği Laboratuvari, Van, Turkey.
Abstract:
Stool and cellophane tape specimens were taken for parasitological examination from 739 people who work in food sector and applied to the public health lab of the Van Health Administration for porter examination. Parasites were determined at 131 people (17.71%) of 739 worker whom samples were investigated. Ninety-five people had one, 30 people had two, 5 people had three and one person had four parasite species. Parasites determined in the study were 19.08% helminthes and 80.91% protozoon. In this study, 1.21% Ascaris lumbricoides, 0.81% Enterobius vermicularis, 0.67% Hymenolepis nana, 0.40% Trichuris trichiura, 0.27% Taenia saginata, 4.87% Blastocystis hominis, 3.24% Entamoeba coli, 2.84% Giardia intestinalis, 2.02% Iodamoeba bütschlii, 0.67% Endolimax nana, 0.27% Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar, 0.27% Chilomastix mesnili, 0.13% Entamoeba hartmanni were found.
Related Concept Videos
Sources of Food Contamination
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Microbes in Food Production
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Reservoir of Infection
Giardiasis

