Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

Relative Risk

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone 10 Years After Regulation: A Case Story of Liquid Soaps and Shampoos.

Contact dermatitis·2026

Same author

Mapping of Former Strategies and Future Needs for Regulatory Prevention of Skin Sensitization: Cosmetic Products.

Contact dermatitis·2026

Same author

Chemical Mixture Exposures and Their Effects on Sensitisation and Elicitation Responses: A Systematic Review.

Contact dermatitis·2025

Same author

Exposures in Indoor Air Affecting Health.

Allergy·2025

Same author

Estimates of skin and blood concentrations of UV-filters: Insights from in vitro skin experiments.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025

Same author

Trialability.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: February 23, 2020

Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.

Linda Schenk¹, Sven Ove Hansson, Christina Rudén

¹Södertörn University College, School of Life Sciences, 14189 Huddinge, Sweden. linda.schenk@sh.se

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP

|January 30, 2008

Summary

Occupational exposure limits (OELs) vary significantly across 18 organizations. While most OELs have declined, differences in chemical selection and average limits persist, requiring further analysis of underlying motivations.

More Related Videos

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

In vitro Cannabis Exposures of Lung Epithelial Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

In vitro Cannabis Exposures of Lung Epithelial Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: June 20, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: February 23, 2020

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

In vitro Cannabis Exposures of Lung Epithelial Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

In vitro Cannabis Exposures of Lung Epithelial Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: June 20, 2025

Area of Science:

Occupational health and safety
Environmental science
Regulatory affairs

Background:

Occupational exposure limits (OELs) are crucial regulatory tools for protecting worker health from chemical exposures.
OELs reflect the outcomes of risk assessments and management processes by standard-setting bodies.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare OELs established by 18 different organizations or national regulatory agencies.
To analyze variations in chemical selection and average exposure limit levels across these organizations.

Main Methods:

Compilation of a database containing OELs for 1341 substances from 18 organizations.
Comparative analysis of chemical coverage and average OEL levels.
Examination of historical data for 8 organizations to identify trends over the past 10 years.

Main Results:

A total of 1341 substances were included; 25 had OELs from all 18 organizations, while over a third were regulated by only one.
Average OEL levels have declined over the past decade for 6 of 8 analyzed organizations.
Significant differences in average OEL levels were observed, with US OSHA limits being approximately 40% higher than Poland's.

Conclusions:

Substantial discrepancies exist in OELs across different regulatory bodies regarding chemical selection and limit values.
Observed trends indicate a general decrease in OELs, but with notable exceptions and variations.
The scientific or policy-related reasons behind these differences require further investigation.