Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

Psychology as a Science

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

Steps in the Modeling Process

Steps in the Modeling Process

Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Can you feel the excitement? Physiological correlates of students' self-reported emotions.

The British journal of educational psychology·2022

Same author

Brain Responses to Peer Feedback in Social Media Are Modulated by Valence in Late Adolescence.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2022

Same author

Exploring the Relations Among Teachers' Epistemic Theories, Work Engagement, Burnout and the Contemporary Challenges of the Teacher Profession.

Frontiers in psychology·2022

Same author

Intraindividual associations between active social media use, exhaustion, and bedtime vary according to age-A longitudinal study across adolescence.

Journal of adolescence·2022

Same author

The Development of Teachers' and Their Students' Social and Emotional Learning During the "Learning to Be Project"-Training Course in Five European Countries.

Frontiers in psychology·2021

Same author

Work Burnout and Engagement Profiles Among Teachers.

Frontiers in psychology·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Does teacher thinking match teaching practice? A study of basic science teachers.

Klara B Laksov¹, Matti Nikkola, Kirsti Lonka

¹Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. klara.bolander.laksov@ki.se

Medical Education

|January 31, 2008

Summary

Many medical educators hold constructivist learning views but do not use corresponding teaching strategies. This study highlights a disconnect between basic science medical teachers

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Cognitive Science
Educational Psychology

Background:

Understanding medical teachers' conceptions of learning is crucial for effective pedagogy.
Alignment between teaching beliefs and practices is often assumed but not empirically verified.
Biomedical education requires innovative teaching approaches to foster deep learning.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate basic science medical teachers' conceptions of learning.
To explore teachers' ideas for facilitating student learning.
To examine the relationship between teachers' learning conceptions and their teaching strategies.

Main Methods:

A questionnaire was administered to 62 teaching staff at a biomedical center.
The questionnaire included open-ended and fixed-choice questions on learning definitions and teaching activities.
Participants described their learning definitions, solutions to educational problems, and teaching intentions.

Main Results:

One in four teachers supported constructivist learning conceptions.
However, only one in eight teachers reported using activating teaching strategies.
Teachers' conceptions of learning did not correlate with their reported teaching practices.

Conclusions:

The study challenges the assumption of alignment between teachers' learning conceptions and their teaching practices.
A significant gap exists between espoused constructivist beliefs and actual pedagogical approaches.
The developed questionnaire can serve as an intervention tool to identify and address discrepancies in medical education.