Function of text structure in jurors' comprehension and decision making
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
Published on: January 10, 2014
1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas of the Permian Basin, 4901 E. University, Odessa, TX 79762, USA. mccullough_g@utpb.edu
Abstract:
The Story Model of Juror Decision Making proposes that jurors develop a story of the case, match the story to verdict templates, and then select the best match between the story and the verdict. The present research investigated the effect different text structures in opening statements and closing arguments had on jurors' recognition for trial information and decision-making. It was hypothesized: (1) narrative opening statements would enhance story construction and (2) comparison-expository closing arguments would enhance story classification. 80 introductory psychology students read a medical malpractice mock lawsuit, rendered a verdict, were tested for recognition of trial facts, and gave an estimate of the surgeon's negligence. The defense's opening statements and closing arguments were written either in narrative or comparison-expository text format. Although weak support for the first hypothesis was found, evidence supporting the effect of comparison-expository text in closing arguments on juror decisions was stronger.
Related Concept Videos
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Reason and Intuition
Introduction to Structures
There are three main...
Framing Effects
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
