Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
Published on: August 16, 2024
Internal consistency, factor structure, and concurrent validity of the treatment evaluation inventory
J T Newton1, R Nabeyama, P Sturmey
1Oral Health Services Research & Dental Public Health, King's College London Dental Institute, King's College London, UK. tim.newton@kcl.ac.uk
The Treatment Evaluation Inventory (TEI) shows high internal consistency for its total score and subscales. However, factor analysis indicates only the full TEI score is valid for measuring treatment acceptability.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Health Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- The Treatment Evaluation Inventory (TEI) is a widely used 19-item scale assessing treatment acceptability.
- It is designed to provide a total score and scores for Patient Progress and Acceptability subscales.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the internal consistency and factor structure of the Treatment Evaluation Inventory (TEI).
- To assess the concurrent validity of the full TEI scale against other treatment acceptability measures.
- To determine the utility of the TEI's subscales.
Main Methods:
- Internal consistency and factor analysis were conducted on two samples (general public and dental students).
- Score distributions and correlations with alternative acceptability measures were examined in a third sample (undergraduate students).
- The TEI was compared with a thermometer rating scale and a 5-point Likert-type scale.
Main Results:
- The TEI total scale and both subscales demonstrated very high internal consistency across samples.
- Factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution that did not align with the existing Patient Progress and Acceptability subscales.
- The full TEI scale exhibited large, significant correlations with other measures, supporting its concurrent validity.
Conclusions:
- While the TEI demonstrates strong internal consistency and concurrent validity for its full scale score.
- The subscales of the TEI do not meet criteria for independent and useful measures.
- It is recommended that only the full TEI scale score be utilized in research and clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
