Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square

Consider a curve representing sample data drawn randomly from a normally distributed population. One must construct confidence intervals to estimate or to test a claim regarding the population standard deviation. For example, a 95% confidence interval covers 95% of the area under the curve, and the remaining 5% is equally distributed on either side of the curve. To achieve such confidence intervals, one must determine the critical values. The critical values are simply the values separating the...

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for k_a Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

ATR-FTIR spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis for monitoring degradation and secondary structure transitions in therapeutic peptide formulations.

Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy·2026

Same author

Toxicity and Appeal of Flavoured E-Cigarettes and Flavour Ban Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026

Same author

Infrared Spectroscopy for Variety Identification and Authenticity Analysis of Tobacco Samples.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Chromatographic fingerprinting with diode array detection for screening regulated plants with potency enhancement properties.

Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment·2026

Same author

Hemp flowers cultivated on a soil contaminated with cadmium, lead and zinc exhibit valorization potential.

International journal of phytoremediation·2026

Same author

Substandard and Falsified Antibiotics Seized in Belgium: Quality Control Analysis Reveals High Prevalence of WHO Watch List Molecules and Bioavailability Non-Compliance.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Statistical confidence for variable selection in QSAR models via Monte Carlo cross-validation.

Dmitry A Konovalov¹, Nigel Sim, Eric Deconinck

¹School of Mathematics, Physics and Information Technology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia. konovalov@jcu.edu.au

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

|February 1, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new Monte Carlo variable selection (MCVS) method simplifies statistical interpretation for quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. This approach effectively identifies key molecular descriptors for predicting drug absorption and permeation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Computational chemistry
cheminformatics
Drug discovery

Background:

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are crucial for predicting drug properties.
Variable selection is a critical step in developing robust QSAR models.
Existing methods may lack straightforward statistical interpretability.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a novel wrapper method for variable selection in QSAR modeling.
To enhance the statistical interpretability of variable selection results.
To demonstrate the applicability of the method to real-world drug absorption problems.

Main Methods:

Development of the Monte Carlo variable selection (MCVS) method based on Monte Carlo cross-validation (MCCV).
Integration of P-value reporting for clear statistical interpretation.
Application to multiple linear regression (MLR)-based and non-MLR-based QSAR models.
Testing on blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeation and human intestinal absorption (HIA) datasets.

Main Results:

The MCVS method provides statistically interpretable P-values for selected variables.
Successful application to BBB permeation and HIA QSAR problems using MLR.
Identification of only two significant molecular descriptors (TPSA(NO) for BBB, ALOGP for HIA) from over 1600 initial descriptors.
The method is robust and applicable across different QSAR modeling frameworks.

Conclusions:

The MCVS method offers a statistically sound and interpretable approach to variable selection in QSAR.
It effectively reduces complex datasets to a minimal set of predictive descriptors.
The method is implemented in the freely available QSAR-BENCH v2 program for academic use.