Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

A Restriction Enzyme Based Cloning Method to Assess the In vitro Replication Capacity of HIV-1 Subtype C Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
Published on: August 31, 2014
Experience with darunavir in HIV-infected adults enrolled in a US expanded access program: results from a single
1Therapeutic Concepts, Houston, TX 77004, USA. drgathe@josephgathe.com
Objective:
A multicenter, international, expanded access program (EAP) was initiated in October 2005 for patients failing multiple antiretroviral regimens. The primary objective was to provide early access to darunavir (DRV) (PREZISTA) co-administered with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) for antiretroviral-experienced patients who failed multiple regimens and had limited treatment options; the secondary objective was to gather additional DRV/r safety information.
Methods:
Following initiation of DRV/r 600/100 mg bid, patients were evaluated at baseline, Weeks 4 and 12, and every 12 weeks thereafter for changes in CD4 cell counts and HIV-1 RNA levels. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.
Results:
Results from patients treated at a single US EAP center in Houston, Texas (N = 38; mean age 47 years; 92% male; 60% Caucasian, 24% Black, 16% Hispanic) are presented. At time of analysis, 38 and 23 patients completed 12 and 24 (+/- 1) weeks of therapy, respectively. At Weeks 12 and 24, the mean change in viral load (VL) from baseline was -1.96 log(10) copies/mL (n = 38) and -2.17 log(10) copies/mL (n = 22), and 54% and 50% of patients achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, respectively. Mean CD4 cell count increased by 109 cells/mm(3) from baseline to Week 24. DRV/r was generally safe and well tolerated. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in severity (nine events considered possibly related to DRV); neither of the two serious AEs was considered related to DRV/r.
Conclusions:
Although this study reflects results from only a small cohort of patients at a single center, among this community-based population of highly treatment-experienced patients, DRV/r 600/100 mg bid provided clinically meaningful decreases in VL, an undetectable rate similar to that seen in the POWER studies, and was well tolerated with infrequent AEs.
Related Concept Videos
Antiviral Nucleoside Inhibitors
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

