A comparison of two sources of data on fungaemia in two hospitals

Quoc Nguyen1, Beth Reid

  • 1The Australian Candidaemia Study, St. Vincent's hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.

Insights

Fungal bloodstream infections (BSI) are underreported in hospital data. Improving documentation on patient records increases accurate coding for these serious infections.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Microbiology
  • Hospital Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Fungal bloodstream infections (BSI) pose a growing threat in healthcare settings.
  • Accurate data collection is crucial for understanding BSI epidemiology and management.
  • Underreporting of BSIs can lead to underestimation of their true burden.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare fungal BSI coding in hospital discharge data against pathology records.
  • To identify the extent of underreporting of fungal BSIs.
  • To determine factors influencing the accurate coding of fungal BSIs.

Main Methods:

  • A 6-year retrospective study comparing hospital discharge data with a pathology database.
  • Analysis of medical records for evidence of fungal BSI.
  • Assessment of coding accuracy based on documentation location within medical records.

Main Results:

  • Significant underreporting of fungal BSI was identified; only 42% of cases from the pathology database were coded in discharge data.
  • Evidence of fungal BSI was present in 97% of medical records identified via the pathology database.
  • Documentation on the front sheet of the medical record increased the likelihood of accurate coding.

Conclusions:

  • Routine hospital discharge data significantly underreports fungal BSI.
  • Clinical documentation practices, particularly noting infections on the front sheet, impact coding accuracy.
  • Enhanced coder review of entire medical records is recommended to improve fungal BSI reporting.

Related Concept Videos