The mechanism of peptide-binding specificity of IAP BIR domains
B P Eckelman1, M Drag, S J Snipas
1Program in Apoptosis and Cell Death Research, Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
We describe the peptide-binding specificity of the baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains of the human inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins, X-linked IAP, cellular IAP1 and neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP). Synthetic peptide libraries were used to profile each domain, and we distinguish two types of binding specificity, which we refer to as type II and type III BIR domains. Both types have a dominant selectivity for Ala in the first position of the four N-terminal residues of the peptide ligands, which constitute a core recognition motif. Our analysis allows us to define the signature of type III BIRs that demonstrate a preference for Pro in the third residue of the ligand, resembling the classic IAP-binding motif (IBM). The signature of the type II BIRs was similar to type III, but with a striking absence of specificity for Pro in the third position, suggesting that the definition of an IBM must be modified depending on the type of BIR in question. These findings explain how subtle changes in the peptide-binding groove of IAP BIR domains can significantly alter the target protein selectivity. Our analysis allows for prediction of BIR domain protein-binding preferences, provides a context for understanding the mechanism of peptide selection and heightens our knowledge of the specificity of IAP antagonists that are being developed as cancer therapeutics.
We describe the peptide-binding specificity of the baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains of the human inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins, X-linked IAP, cellular IAP1 and neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP). Synthetic peptide libraries were used to profile each domain, and we distinguish two types of binding specificity, which we refer to as type II and type III BIR domains. Both types have a dominant selectivity for Ala in the first position of the four N-terminal residues of the peptide ligands, which constitute a core recognition motif. Our analysis allows us to define the signature of type III BIRs that demonstrate a preference for Pro in the third residue of the ligand, resembling the classic IAP-binding motif (IBM). The signature of the type II BIRs was similar to type III, but with a striking absence of specificity for Pro in the third position, suggesting that the definition of an IBM must be modified depending on the type of BIR in question. These findings explain how subtle changes in the peptide-binding groove of IAP BIR domains can significantly alter the target protein selectivity. Our analysis allows for prediction of BIR domain protein-binding preferences, provides a context for understanding the mechanism of peptide selection and heightens our knowledge of the specificity of IAP antagonists that are being developed as cancer therapeutics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Phosphoinositides and PIPs
Different phosphoinositides are synthesized and recruited on the cytosolic face of the plasma membrane. The localization of specific phosphoinositides concentrated in separate membrane...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Protein-protein Interfaces


