Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Programs, models, theories, and reality.

Robert I Damper1

  • 1Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom rid@ecs.soton.ac.uk www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~rid.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automatic syllabification in English: a comparison of different algorithms.

Language and speech·2009
Same author

A signal theory approach to support vector classification: the sinc kernel.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2009
Same author

A Bayesian framework for extracting human gait using strong prior knowledge.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2006
Same author

Segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a combination of neural networks and active contour models.

Medical engineering & physics·2003
Same author

A semi-localized elastic net for surface reconstruction of objects from multislice images.

International journal of neural systems·2002
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

This commentary explores whether biorobots accurately model biological behavior. It argues that while models and reality may align, they remain distinct entities and should not be conflated.

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Computational Biology
  • Robotics

Background:

  • The efficacy of biorobots as models for biological behavior is debated.
  • Understanding the relationship between computational models and biological reality is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between computer programs, models, theories, and reality.
  • To present an antirealist perspective on the modeling capabilities of biorobots.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the nature of models and theories.
  • Conceptual exploration of the distinctions between computational constructs and biological systems.

Main Results:

  • Biorobots, computer programs, models, and theories are distinct from biological reality.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These entities may converge in specific instances but are fundamentally separate.

    • Conclusions:

    • Biorobots are not inherently good models of biological behavior.
    • Maintaining a clear distinction between models and reality is essential in scientific inquiry.