Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

On the generality of behavioral theory and abstract phenomena.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2026

Same author

Comparisons of extinction, counterconditioning, and novelty-facilitated extinction within ABA vs. ABC renewal designs.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026

Same author

Rethinking memory impairments: Retrieval failure.

Psychological review·2025

Same author

Contextual modulation of human associative learning following novelty-facilitated extinction, counterconditioning, and conventional extinction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024

Same author

Cue duration and trial spacing effects in contingency assessment in the streaming procedure with humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024

Same author

Associative interference and nonreinforcement in human contingency learning.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs

Published on: June 5, 2019

Differentiating robotic behavior and artificial intelligence from animal behavior and biological intelligence:

Ralph R Miller¹, Francisco Arcediano

¹Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 rmiller@binghamton.edu arcedian@binghamton.edu.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|February 5, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Neuroscience models should not be accepted solely based on performance, as success does not prove analogous mechanisms. However, these computational models are valuable for stimulating new research directions in animal studies.

More Related Videos

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs

Published on: June 5, 2019

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Computational modeling
Animal behavior

Background:

Neuroscience models often aim to replicate animal behavior.
A common misconception is that performance similarity implies mechanistic similarity.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the interpretation of neuroscience models based on their performance.
To highlight the role of models in driving future research.

Main Methods:

Analysis of the relationship between model performance and underlying mechanisms.
Discussion of the implications for contemporary animal research.

Main Results:

Model success in replicating animal behavior does not validate the model's internal processes.
Simulation failure is a valid reason for model rejection.

Conclusions:

Neuroscience models should be rigorously tested beyond mere performance metrics.
Models, regardless of success, are crucial for generating novel hypotheses and research questions in neuroscience.