Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
No problem for Aristotle's subject and predicate
1Psychologie Cognitive, Université de Paris VIII, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 93526 Saint-Denis, France politzer@univ-paris8.fr.
Abstract:
It is argued that, in the traditional subject-predicate sentence, two interpretations of the subject term coexist, one intensional and the other extensional, which explains the superficial difference between the traditional S-P relation and the predication of predicate logic. Data from psychological studies of syllogistic reasoning support the view that the contrast between predicate and argument is carried over to the traditional S-P sentence.
Related Concept Videos
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Parseval's Theorem
Interestingly, Parseval's theorem also holds for the trigonometric form of the Fourier series, which expresses a...
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving
Deductive Reasoning
Principle of Equivalence
Castigliano's Theorem: Problem Solving

