Is alignment always the result of automatic priming?
Robert M Krauss1, Jennifer S Pardo
1Psychology Department, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 rmk@psych.columbia.edu jsp2003@columbia.edu http://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/commlab/ http://www.columbia.edu/~jsp2003/
Abstract:
Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) mechanistic theory of dialogue attempts to detail the psychological processes involved in communication that are lacking in Clark's theory. By relying on automatic priming and alignment processes, however, the theory falters when it comes to explaining much of dialogic interaction. We argue for the inclusion of less automatic, though not completely conscious and deliberate, processes to explain such phenomena.
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
First Impression
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase Enzyme
Proofreading
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...


