Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

In Vitro Tumor Cell Rechallenge For Predictive Evaluation of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Antitumor Function
Published on: February 27, 2019
Results of a phase III clinical trial: CHOP versus CMED in peripheral T-cell lymphoma unspecified
Agustin Avilés1, Claudia Castañeda, Natividad Neri
1Oncology Research Unit, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, IMSS, Mexico, DF, Mexico. agustin.aviles@imss.gob.mx
Abstract:
We performed a controlled clinical trial to define the use of a brief therapy: CMED (cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methotrexate, and dexamethasone) compared with standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma unspecific (PTCLu). The end point to the study was to assess efficacy, measured from complete response rate (CRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival in 217 previously untreated patients with PTCLu. In an intent-to treat analysis all patients were evaluable. CRR was 76% in CMED regimen and 57% in CHOP arm (P<0.05); actuarial curves at 10 years showed that PFS was 70% and 43%, respectively (P<0.01); overall survival was 60% and 34%, respectively (P<0.01). Adjuvant radiotherapy was employed in 48 cases (54% of patients who achieve CR in CMED arm) and 30 patients (47% of patients who achieve CR in CHOP arm). Acute toxicity was mild and well tolerated. Our results showed that the CMED regimen is feasible and effective in PTCLu.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

