Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Auditory Ossicles

The Auditory Ossicles

The auditory ossicles of the middle ear transmit sounds from the air as vibrations to the fluid-filled cochlea. The auditory ossicles consist of two malleus (hammer) bones, two incus (anvil) bones, and two stapes (stirrups), one on each side. These bones develop during the fetal stage and are the ones to ossify first. They are fully mature at birth and do not grow afterward.
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...

Anatomy of the Ear

Anatomy of the Ear

Auditory sensation, commonly called hearing, involves the transformation of sonic waves into neural impulses facilitated by the structures of the auditory organ. The prominent, flesh-like structure on the side of the head, called the auricle, directs sound waves towards the auditory canal. The auricle is often mislabeled as the pinna, a term more aligned with mobile structures like a feline's external ear. The auditory canal penetrates the cranium via the external auditory meatus of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluation of a New, Community-Based Screening Program to Detect Hearing Loss in Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors in Switzerland: Findings From the HEAR Study.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2026

Same author

Development of a Speech Intelligibility Test for Children in Swiss German Dialects.

Audiology research·2026

Same author

Comparison of an adhesive wearing option and a headband in a non-implantable bone conduction hearing device.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026

Same author

Experimental comparison between forward and reverse Vibrant Soundbridge cochlear stimulation.

Hearing research·2026

Same author

Mechanical properties of 3D voxel-printed materials for cardiovascular tissue imitation.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2025

Same author

A Health Service Research Study on a Low-Threshold Hearing Screening Program for Childhood Cancer Survivors in Switzerland: Protocol for the HEAR Study.

JMIR research protocols·2025

Same journal

Presentation Highlights: International service delivery.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2023

Same journal

Iraq/Afghanistan-era Veterans with back pain: Characteristics and predictors of compensation and pension award.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2021

Same journal

Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: A prospective study.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2020

Same journal

Tongue-controlled robotic rehabilitation: A feasibility study in people with stroke.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017

Same journal

Utility of a multimodal neurophysiologic assessment tool in distinguishing between individuals with and without a history of mild traumatic brain injury.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017

Same journal

Efficacy of extremely low-frequency magnetic field in fibromyalgia pain: A pilot study.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2017

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol

Published on: August 18, 2023

Human temporal bones versus mechanical model to evaluate three middle ear transducers.

Christof Stieger¹, Hans Bernhard, Daniela Waeckerlin

¹Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. christof.stieger@dkf.unibe.ch

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

|February 6, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A mechanical middle ear model offers reproducible and simpler testing for implantable hearing aid transducers, including the driving rod transducer (DRT) and floating mass transducer (FMT). Optimizing mounting parameters can enhance the contactless transducer (CLT) output.

More Related Videos

High-Speed Human Temporal Bone Sectioning for the Assessment of COVID-19-Associated Middle Ear Pathology

High-Speed Human Temporal Bone Sectioning for the Assessment of COVID-19-Associated Middle Ear Pathology

Published on: May 18, 2022

Dissection of the Auditory Bulla in Postnatal Mice: Isolation of the Middle Ear Bones and Histological Analysis

Dissection of the Auditory Bulla in Postnatal Mice: Isolation of the Middle Ear Bones and Histological Analysis

Published on: January 4, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol

Extracting the Cochlea from a Human Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Protocol

Published on: August 18, 2023

High-Speed Human Temporal Bone Sectioning for the Assessment of COVID-19-Associated Middle Ear Pathology

High-Speed Human Temporal Bone Sectioning for the Assessment of COVID-19-Associated Middle Ear Pathology

Published on: May 18, 2022

Dissection of the Auditory Bulla in Postnatal Mice: Isolation of the Middle Ear Bones and Histological Analysis

Dissection of the Auditory Bulla in Postnatal Mice: Isolation of the Middle Ear Bones and Histological Analysis

Published on: January 4, 2017

Area of Science:

Biomedical Engineering
Otolaryngology
Medical Devices

Background:

Implantable hearing aids require precise middle ear transducer technology.
Evaluating transducer performance is crucial for device efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the performance and practicality of three middle ear transducers: driving rod transducer (DRT), floating mass transducer (FMT), and contactless transducer (CLT).
To assess the utility of a life-size mechanical middle ear model versus human temporal bones for transducer evaluation.

Main Methods:

Experiments were conducted using a life-size mechanical middle ear model and human temporal bones.
Three transducers (DRT, FMT, CLT) were tested and their outputs analyzed.
Mounting parameters for each transducer were systematically varied to assess their impact on performance.

Main Results:

Mechanical model results closely matched human temporal bone data but demonstrated superior reproducibility.
The mechanical model proved simpler and less time-consuming to use.
DRT output was insensitive to rod angle; FMT output was more affected by cable mass loading than crimp tightness; CLT output improved by 10 dB with optimized mounting.

Conclusions:

A mechanical middle ear model provides a reliable, reproducible, and efficient platform for evaluating implantable hearing aid transducers.
Understanding the influence of mounting parameters is key to optimizing transducer performance, particularly for the CLT.