Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants.

Bryan E Pfingst¹, Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz, Li Xu

¹Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5616, USA. bpfingst@umich.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|February 6, 2008

Summary

Cochlear implant users show significant variability in detecting temporal sound modulation across stimulation sites. This variability, unique to each individual, suggests that factors like electrode position and neuron health influence sound perception, aiding in personalized hearing strategies.

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Does simple impedance reflect intrascalar tissue in the implanted cochlea?

Hearing research·2025

Same author

Contributions of Auditory Nerve Density and Synchrony to Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear Implant Users.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2025

Same author

Reexamining the effects of electrode location on measures of neural health in cochlear implant users.

JASA express letters·2023

Same author

Association of Aging and Cognition With Complex Speech Understanding in Cochlear-Implanted Adults: Use of a Modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognitive Assessment.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2023

Same author

Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2023

Same author

Components of impedance in a cochlear implant animal model with TGFβ1-accelerated fibrosis.

Hearing research·2022

Area of Science:

Audiology
Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

Cochlear implants (CIs) use electrical pulse modulation for sound information.
Temporal modulation of charge per phase is crucial for sound recognition in CIs.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) across stimulation sites in CI users.
To investigate factors influencing variability in MDTs within and across subjects.

Main Methods:

Measured MDTs using sinusoidal modulation at each stimulation site in 22-electrode CIs.
Tested 14 adult subjects with varying CI usage.

Main Results:

MDTs exhibited significant across-site variability in most listeners.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published on: August 4, 2023

Subject-specific patterns of MDT variability were observed.

MDT variability correlated with peripheral factors like electrode placement and neural integrity.

MDTs were not consistently correlated with T levels, C levels, or dynamic ranges.

Conclusions:

Peripheral site-specific characteristics significantly influence modulation sensitivity in CI users.
Subject-specific MDT patterns may help diagnose speech recognition differences.
MDT mapping can guide personalized strategies to enhance CI perception.