Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.

Justin A Harris1, Evan J Livesey

  • 1School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia. justinh@psych.usyd.edu.au

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|February 6, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting continuous outcomes: Some new tests of associative approaches to contingency learning.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Prediction-based sensory attenuation is related to prediction-based motor attenuation.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Acquisition and extinction of conditioned action tendencies in the motor cortex.

Neuroscience·2026
Same author

The partial reinforcement extinction effect: Learning about trial sequences or time to reinforcement.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same author

Information, certainty, and learning.

eLife·2026
Same author

The transfer of conditioned and extinguished placebo hypoalgesia across contexts.

The journal of pain·2025
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Human participants learned patterning discriminations faster than biconditional discriminations in a causal judgment task. These findings challenge current models of stimulus representation, particularly those using configural representations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Learning and Memory

Background:

  • Causal judgment tasks are crucial for understanding how humans learn associations.
  • Previous models of stimulus representation, such as configural representations, have been used to explain learning.
  • These models predict different learning rates for various discrimination types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human learning rates in causal judgment tasks involving patterning and biconditional discriminations.
  • To test the explanatory power of configural representation models against empirical data.
  • To identify factors influencing rule application and outcome summation expectations.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments involving human participants performing causal judgment tasks.
  • Simultaneous presentation of two reciprocal patterning discriminations and one biconditional discrimination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Postdiscrimination tests to assess rule application and summation expectations.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants learned patterning discriminations significantly faster than biconditional discriminations.
    • Learning rates were consistent across groups, irrespective of rule application or summation expectations.
    • The observed learning patterns were inconsistent with predictions from configural representation models.

    Conclusions:

    • Human learning of patterning discriminations is more efficient than biconditional discriminations.
    • Existing configural representation models may not fully capture the complexities of human causal learning.
    • Further research is needed to develop more accurate models of stimulus representation and associative learning.