Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026
14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Researching reducing health disparities: mixed-methods approaches.
Miriam Stewart1, Edward Makwarimba, Alison Barnfather
1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. miriam.stewart@ualberta.ca
Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|February 6, 2008
Summary
Mixed methods research effectively assesses social support
Area of Science:
- Health Disparities Research
- Social Support Interventions
- Mixed Methods Research
Background:
- Health disparities require focused assessment and intervention research.
- Social support significantly mediates health outcomes in vulnerable populations.
- Mixed methods approaches can enhance understanding and intervention design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the benefits and challenges of using mixed methods to investigate health inequities.
- To illustrate the application of mixed methods in two exemplar studies with vulnerable populations in Canada.
- To demonstrate the value of mixed methods in reducing health disparities.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative methods were used to understand support needs, resources, and intervention preferences.
- Quantitative methods were employed to document intervention effectiveness and outcomes.
- Participatory strategies were integrated to enhance study relevance and empowerment.
Main Results:
- Qualitative data provided in-depth insights into vulnerable populations' experiences.
- Quantitative data confirmed the effectiveness and improved validity of interventions.
- Mixed methods enhanced the assessment of social support's impact on health.
Conclusions:
- Mixed methods research is crucial for effectively addressing health disparities.
- Participatory approaches are essential for contextually appropriate and empowering interventions.
- Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods strengthens health equity research.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
01:26Introduction to Epidemiology
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
01:27Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...