Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural-network models for the blood glucose metabolism of a diabetic.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2008
Same author

A regularization approach to continuous learning with an application to financial derivatives pricing.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2003
Same author

A Bayesian committee machine.

Neural computation·2000
Same author

Model-independent mean-field theory as a local method for approximate propagation of information.

Network (Bristol, England)·1999
Same author

Videographic tomography. II. Reconstruction with fan-beam projection data.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·1994
Same author

Video-rate reconstruction of CT and MR images.

Progress in clinical and biological research·1991
Same journal

Universal perceptron and DNA-like learning algorithm for binary neural networks: LSBF and PBF implementations.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2013
Same journal

Guest editorial: special section on white box nonlinear prediction models.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2011
Same journal

Data-based fault-tolerant control of high-speed trains with traction/braking notch nonlinearities and actuator failures.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2011
Same journal

Guest editorial: special section on data-based control, modeling, and optimization.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2011
Same journal

Neural network-based multiple robot simultaneous localization and mapping.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2011
Same journal

Data-driven model-free adaptive control for a class of MIMO nonlinear discrete-time systems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2011
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Averaging, maximum penalized likelihood and Bayesian estimation for improving Gaussian mixture probability density

D Ormoneit1, V Tresp

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität München, 81730 München, Germany.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
|February 7, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Averaging Gaussian mixture models improved probability density estimation. Maximum penalized likelihood was superior when the penalty was appropriate, while averaging offered greater robustness for complex problems.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Gaussian mixture models are crucial in neural network applications.
  • Probability density estimation is a fundamental task in statistical modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of averaging ensembles of estimators for probability density estimation.
  • To compare averaging with maximum penalized likelihood and Bayesian approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Applied averaging to Gaussian mixture models across three datasets.
  • Implemented maximum penalized likelihood with an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm.
  • Utilized a Bayesian approach for comparison.

Main Results:

  • Both maximum penalized likelihood and averaging significantly outperformed maximum likelihood.
  • Maximum penalized likelihood excelled in two experiments; averaging was superior in one.
  • The Bayesian approach performed well on low-dimensional data but struggled with higher dimensions.

Conclusions:

  • Maximum penalized likelihood is effective when penalty terms align with the problem.
  • Averaging provides robust performance, especially when specific prior assumptions are unknown.
  • The choice of method depends on problem characteristics and prior knowledge.