Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Development of the Gagging Problem Assessment: a pilot study.

G F E C Van Linden van den Heuvell1, B J Ter Pelkwijk, B Stegenga

  • 1University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Special Dental Care, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
|February 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Medicaments and oral healthcare. Mechanisms of interaction between medicaments].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2019
Same author

Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

PloS one·2017
Same author

[Complaints of pain in the orofacial area of non-odontogenic origin].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2016
Same author

[Recent increase in simple extractions in OMF-surgeries in the Netherlands studied].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2016
Same author

[Taking responsibility. A good intention for 2016].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2015
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of a Biodegradable Compared to a Titanium Fixation System in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

PloS one·2015
Same journal

Pharmacologic Management of Sleep Bruxism in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Polysomnographic Outcomes.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Burning Mouth Syndrome: Understanding the Biopsychosocial Dimensions of Invisible Pain.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Mechanisms Underlying Burning Mouth Syndrome and Occlusal Dysesthesia: Shared and Distinct Pathways of Oral Sensory Dysregulation.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Closing the Implementation Gap in Occlusal Dysesthesia (Phantom Bite Syndrome): From Knowledge Gaps to Prosthodontic Care Pathways.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Association of Fried Frailty Phenotype With Occlusal Status, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Nutritional Status Among Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Can Deep Learning Methods Differentiate Temporomandibular Joint Disorders From Healthy Joints? A 3D Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Study Based on CBCT Images.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

A new tool, the Gagging Problem Assessment (GPA), reliably identifies dental gagging issues. This validated instrument distinguishes gagging from dental anxiety, paving the way for evidence-based treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Dental research
  • Clinical psychology
  • Measurement science

Background:

  • Dental gagging lacks a standardized management strategy.
  • A validated instrument is crucial for evidence-based treatment development.
  • Dental anxiety is often conflated with gagging, necessitating differentiation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Gagging Problem Assessment (GPA) tool.
  • To assess the GPA's ability to differentiate dental gagging from dental anxiety.
  • To establish a diagnostic and evaluative instrument for clinical gagging problems.

Main Methods:

  • Pilot study comparing individuals with and without gagging problems (n=25).
  • Utilized the Gagging Problem Assessment (GPA) patient and dentist components.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed statistical analyses including Cohen's kappa, Cronbach's alpha, and Mann-Whitney U-test.

    • Main Results:

    • The GPA demonstrated satisfactory inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.64).
    • The GPA questionnaire proved reliable in assessing gagging problems.
    • Significant differences were observed between gagging and control groups, indicating specificity.

    Conclusions:

    • Dental gagging is a distinct issue, not merely a form of dental anxiety.
    • The GPA is a reliable tool for assessing dental gagging.
    • Further validation with larger sample sizes is recommended.