Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Inferences from semifactual 'even if' conditionals.

Sergio Moreno-Ríos1, Juan A García-Madruga, Ruth M J Byrne

  • 1Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Granada, Spain. semoreno@ugr.es

Acta Psychologica
|February 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

The Spanish version of the computerized dynamic test of analogical reasoning.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

What children and adults understand when a conditional is said to be false.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

If someone is wrong but sincere, is it a lie? The role of objective falsity, intention, and in children's understanding of lying.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025
Same author

The temporal negation suspension strategy in negative conditionals.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Introduction to Progress and Puzzles of Cognitive Science: Introduction to a Wiley Virtual Issue.

Cognitive science·2024
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Finding calm to stay engaged: Foreign language peace of mind as a mediator between L2 growth mindset and engagement among Chinese EFL learners" [Acta Psychologica 260 (2025) 105548].

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Relational context shapes interpersonal coordination in naturalistic interaction.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Objectification at work: The impact of algorithmic management on employee work engagement.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

MRI correlates of emotion recognition in vascular dementia: An empty systematic review.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

The core symptoms of elementary school students' fear of negative evaluation and its network relationship with self-confidence and family atmosphere.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Examining the moderating role of psychological hardiness in the relation between job demands and teachers' emotional exhaustion.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

People interpret semifactual conditionals differently than standard logic suggests. When presented with a conditional where the premise is false but the outcome is true, they infer the outcome rather than a negation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Philosophy of Language

Background:

  • Semifactual conditionals present a unique logical structure where the antecedent is counterfactual and the consequent is factual.
  • Understanding how individuals reason with these conditionals is crucial for cognitive and linguistic theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human reasoning patterns with semifactual conditionals.
  • To compare reasoning with semifactuals to indicative and subjunctive conditionals.
  • To explore the cognitive processes underlying semifactual interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using different types of conditional statements.
  • Participants were presented with semifactual conditionals and asked to draw inferences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparisons were made between 'even if' subjunctive, 'if' indicative, 'even though' indicative concessive, and 'if...also/still' subjunctive conditionals.

    • Main Results:

    • Reasoners did not draw standard logical inferences from the denial of the antecedent or affirmation of the consequent.
    • Instead of inferring the negation of the antecedent, participants inferred the consequent.
    • Instead of inferring the consequent from the affirmation of the consequent, participants concluded no valid inference could be made.

    Conclusions:

    • Human reasoning with semifactuals deviates from classical logic.
    • Individuals appear to consider both a conjectured possibility and the presupposed facts when interpreting semifactuals.
    • This suggests a distinct cognitive mechanism for processing semifactual conditionals.